| Survey area of interest | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching and learning | 56 | 4314 | 11528 |
| 96.6% | 91.0% | 95.5% | |
| Research and scholarship | 37 | 3111 | 6164 |
| 63.8% | 65.6% | 51.1% | |
| Total respondent count | 58 | 4741 | 12070 |
| Full or part time | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time faculty member | 45 | 4136 | 8656 |
| 77.6% | 87.2% | 71.7% | |
| Part-time faculty member | 13 | 573 | 3345 |
| 22.4% | 12.1% | 27.7% | |
| Emeritus faculty member | 0 | 32 | 69 |
| 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
58 | 4741 | 12070 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Survey version | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Take the shorter (10-minute) version | 39 | 3471 | 8765 |
| 67.2% | 73.2% | 72.6% | |
| Take the longer (up to 30-minute) version | 19 | 1270 | 3305 |
| 32.8% | 26.8% | 27.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
58 | 4741 | 12070 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 1.1. Years of experience | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time faculty position | Mean | 11.5 | 14.2 | 12.8 |
| SD | 9.6 | 11.4 | 10.8 | |
| N | 52 | 4398 | 10046 | |
| Part-time faculty position | Mean | 6.4 | 4.1 | 6.0 |
| SD | 6.9 | 5.5 | 6.4 | |
| N | 38 | 2131 | 7196 | |
| Any faculty position | Mean | 14.5 | 15.1 | 14.2 |
| SD | 10.3 | 11.3 | 10.8 | |
| N | 58 | 4724 | 12035 | |
| 1.2. Do you work with… | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Undergraduate students | 49 | 3464 | 10078 |
| 84.5% | 73.4% | 83.9% | |
| Graduate students | 26 | 2869 | 4881 |
| 44.8% | 60.8% | 40.6% | |
| Professional students | 5 | 899 | 1541 |
| 8.6% | 19.1% | 12.8% | |
| I don't typically work directly with students. | 0 | 154 | 177 |
| 0.0% | 3.3% | 1.5% | |
| Total respondent count | 58 | 4719 | 12019 |
| 1.3. Tenure status | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tenured | 18 | 1968 | 4275 |
| 40.9% | 47.8% | 49.7% | |
| Not tenured, but on a tenure track | 9 | 637 | 1622 |
| 20.5% | 15.5% | 18.9% | |
| Not on a tenure track (ongoing appointment) | 14 | 916 | 1694 |
| 31.8% | 22.3% | 19.7% | |
| Not on a tenure track (fixed-term appointment) | 3 | 594 | 1011 |
| 6.8% | 14.4% | 11.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
44 | 4115 | 8602 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 1.4. Academic rank | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emeritus faculty | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Professor | 5 | 1156 | 2485 |
| 11.1% | 28.1% | 28.8% | |
| Associate professor | 13 | 1023 | 2158 |
| 28.9% | 24.9% | 25.0% | |
| Assistant professor | 12 | 897 | 1994 |
| 26.7% | 21.8% | 23.1% | |
| Clinical professor | 2 | 57 | 79 |
| 4.4% | 1.4% | 0.9% | |
| Instructor | 1 | 361 | 906 |
| 2.2% | 8.8% | 10.5% | |
| Senior lecturer | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Qualifying post | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Lecturer | 9 | 304 | 490 |
| 20.0% | 7.4% | 5.7% | |
| Research associate | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Research professor | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| Other; please specify | 3 | 287 | 436 |
| 6.7% | 7.0% | 5.1% | |
| No academic rank | 0 | 29 | 64 |
| 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
45 | 4115 | 8615 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.1. Own: Desktop | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t plan to purchase one | 12 | 1098 | 3018 |
| 21.1% | 24.7% | 27.1% | |
| No, but I plan to purchase one | 1 | 47 | 136 |
| 1.8% | 1.1% | 1.2% | |
| Yes, I currently own one (or more) | 44 | 3306 | 8002 |
| 77.2% | 74.3% | 71.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4451 | 11156 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.1. Own: Laptop | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t plan to purchase one | 3 | 271 | 871 |
| 5.2% | 5.8% | 7.4% | |
| No, but I plan to purchase one | 0 | 68 | 195 |
| 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.7% | |
| Yes, I currently own one (or more) | 55 | 4315 | 10692 |
| 94.8% | 92.7% | 90.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
58 | 4654 | 11758 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.1. Own: Tablet | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t plan to purchase one | 9 | 923 | 2189 |
| 18.4% | 21.8% | 20.4% | |
| No, but I plan to purchase one | 5 | 208 | 577 |
| 10.2% | 4.9% | 5.4% | |
| Yes, I currently own one (or more) | 35 | 3095 | 7990 |
| 71.4% | 73.2% | 74.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
49 | 4226 | 10756 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.1. Own: Smartphone | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t plan to purchase one | 1 | 486 | 1219 |
| 1.8% | 10.7% | 10.6% | |
| No, but I plan to purchase one | 0 | 120 | 315 |
| 0.0% | 2.6% | 2.7% | |
| Yes, I currently own one (or more) | 54 | 3943 | 9950 |
| 98.2% | 86.7% | 86.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4549 | 11484 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.1. Own: Wearable technology | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t plan to purchase one | 10 | 707 | 1772 |
| 76.9% | 68.8% | 67.6% | |
| No, but I plan to purchase one | 0 | 86 | 229 |
| 0.0% | 8.4% | 8.7% | |
| Yes, I currently own one (or more) | 3 | 235 | 620 |
| 23.1% | 22.9% | 23.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
13 | 1028 | 2621 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.1. Own: Internet-connected gaming device | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t plan to purchase one | 8 | 755 | 1792 |
| 53.3% | 72.5% | 67.9% | |
| No, but I plan to purchase one | 0 | 12 | 26 |
| 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.0% | |
| Yes, I currently own one (or more) | 7 | 274 | 823 |
| 46.7% | 26.3% | 31.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
15 | 1041 | 2641 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.2. Required to own or provided with desktop | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Required to own by institution | 2 | 48 | 169 |
| 11.8% | 4.0% | 5.6% | |
| Provided by institution | 9 | 748 | 1720 |
| 52.9% | 62.9% | 56.6% | |
| Neither required to own nor provided | 7 | 411 | 1183 |
| 41.2% | 34.5% | 38.9% | |
| Total respondent count | 17 | 1190 | 3040 |
| 2.2. Required to own or provided with laptop | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Required to own by institution | 1 | 39 | 151 |
| 5.3% | 3.3% | 4.9% | |
| Provided by institution | 8 | 569 | 1474 |
| 42.1% | 47.5% | 47.7% | |
| Neither required to own nor provided | 10 | 600 | 1486 |
| 52.6% | 50.1% | 48.1% | |
| Total respondent count | 19 | 1197 | 3088 |
| 2.2. Required to own or provided with tablet | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Required to own by institution | 0 | 4 | 17 |
| 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.6% | |
| Provided by institution | 2 | 176 | 495 |
| 13.3% | 15.8% | 17.3% | |
| Neither required to own nor provided | 13 | 936 | 2350 |
| 86.7% | 83.9% | 82.2% | |
| Total respondent count | 15 | 1115 | 2858 |
| 2.2. Required to own or provided with smartphone | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Required to own by institution | 1 | 16 | 41 |
| 6.3% | 1.5% | 1.5% | |
| Provided by institution | 1 | 31 | 51 |
| 6.3% | 2.8% | 1.8% | |
| Neither required to own nor provided | 14 | 1056 | 2698 |
| 87.5% | 95.8% | 96.7% | |
| Total respondent count | 16 | 1102 | 2789 |
| 2.3. Experiences: Classroom-based technology resources | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 5 | 107 | 249 |
| 26.3% | 8.4% | 7.5% | |
| Fair | 0 | 195 | 479 |
| 0.0% | 15.3% | 14.5% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 180 | 376 |
| 5.3% | 14.2% | 11.4% | |
| Good | 5 | 484 | 1294 |
| 26.3% | 38.1% | 39.2% | |
| Excellent | 7 | 215 | 623 |
| 36.8% | 16.9% | 18.9% | |
| N/A | 1 | 90 | 280 |
| 5.3% | 7.1% | 8.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1271 | 3301 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Laboratory or research-based technology resources | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 2 | 88 | 240 |
| 10.5% | 7.0% | 7.3% | |
| Fair | 1 | 101 | 291 |
| 5.3% | 8.0% | 8.8% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 163 | 414 |
| 5.3% | 12.9% | 12.6% | |
| Good | 8 | 375 | 888 |
| 42.1% | 29.6% | 27.0% | |
| Excellent | 0 | 157 | 423 |
| 0.0% | 12.4% | 12.9% | |
| N/A | 7 | 382 | 1034 |
| 36.8% | 30.2% | 31.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1266 | 3290 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Online collaborative spaces | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 95 | 235 |
| 5.3% | 7.5% | 7.1% | |
| Fair | 0 | 154 | 353 |
| 0.0% | 12.2% | 10.7% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 212 | 523 |
| 26.3% | 16.7% | 15.9% | |
| Good | 8 | 418 | 1106 |
| 42.1% | 33.0% | 33.5% | |
| Excellent | 4 | 169 | 545 |
| 21.1% | 13.3% | 16.5% | |
| N/A | 1 | 218 | 536 |
| 5.3% | 17.2% | 16.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1266 | 3298 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Physical collaborative spaces | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 2 | 120 | 279 |
| 10.5% | 9.5% | 8.5% | |
| Fair | 4 | 186 | 467 |
| 21.1% | 14.7% | 14.2% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 209 | 493 |
| 15.8% | 16.5% | 14.9% | |
| Good | 4 | 359 | 997 |
| 21.1% | 28.3% | 30.2% | |
| Excellent | 3 | 148 | 481 |
| 15.8% | 11.7% | 14.6% | |
| N/A | 3 | 245 | 583 |
| 15.8% | 19.3% | 17.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1267 | 3300 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Access to institutional resources while away | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 0 | 58 | 172 |
| 0.0% | 4.6% | 5.2% | |
| Fair | 2 | 139 | 350 |
| 10.5% | 10.9% | 10.6% | |
| Neutral | 0 | 149 | 373 |
| 0.0% | 11.7% | 11.3% | |
| Good | 5 | 555 | 1396 |
| 26.3% | 43.6% | 42.3% | |
| Excellent | 11 | 327 | 904 |
| 57.9% | 25.7% | 27.4% | |
| N/A | 1 | 44 | 104 |
| 5.3% | 3.5% | 3.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1272 | 3299 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Ability to get my work done while away | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 0 | 50 | 133 |
| 0.0% | 3.9% | 4.0% | |
| Fair | 2 | 120 | 307 |
| 10.5% | 9.5% | 9.3% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 123 | 304 |
| 5.3% | 9.7% | 9.2% | |
| Good | 4 | 538 | 1366 |
| 21.1% | 42.4% | 41.4% | |
| Excellent | 12 | 419 | 1121 |
| 63.2% | 33.0% | 34.0% | |
| N/A | 0 | 18 | 68 |
| 0.0% | 1.4% | 2.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1268 | 3299 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Reliable access to Wi-Fi networks throughout facilities | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 0 | 112 | 281 |
| 0.0% | 8.8% | 8.5% | |
| Fair | 4 | 219 | 490 |
| 21.1% | 17.3% | 14.9% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 124 | 314 |
| 10.5% | 9.8% | 9.5% | |
| Good | 4 | 449 | 1136 |
| 21.1% | 35.4% | 34.5% | |
| Excellent | 9 | 327 | 873 |
| 47.4% | 25.8% | 26.5% | |
| N/A | 0 | 37 | 198 |
| 0.0% | 2.9% | 6.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1268 | 3292 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Communication technologies | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 0 | 62 | 124 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 3.8% | |
| Fair | 0 | 111 | 293 |
| 0.0% | 8.8% | 8.9% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 161 | 374 |
| 10.5% | 12.7% | 11.4% | |
| Good | 10 | 559 | 1462 |
| 52.6% | 44.1% | 44.4% | |
| Excellent | 7 | 337 | 949 |
| 36.8% | 26.6% | 28.8% | |
| N/A | 0 | 38 | 89 |
| 0.0% | 3.0% | 2.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1268 | 3291 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Online or virtual technologies | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 2 | 112 | 283 |
| 10.5% | 8.8% | 8.6% | |
| Fair | 0 | 164 | 388 |
| 0.0% | 12.9% | 11.8% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 236 | 594 |
| 15.8% | 18.6% | 18.0% | |
| Good | 9 | 421 | 1109 |
| 47.4% | 33.1% | 33.7% | |
| Excellent | 4 | 176 | 512 |
| 21.1% | 13.9% | 15.6% | |
| N/A | 1 | 161 | 405 |
| 5.3% | 12.7% | 12.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1270 | 3291 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Remote access to commercial software applications | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 136 | 397 |
| 5.3% | 10.8% | 12.1% | |
| Fair | 1 | 134 | 350 |
| 5.3% | 10.6% | 10.6% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 180 | 420 |
| 21.1% | 14.2% | 12.8% | |
| Good | 7 | 230 | 602 |
| 36.8% | 18.2% | 18.3% | |
| Excellent | 3 | 85 | 267 |
| 15.8% | 6.7% | 8.1% | |
| N/A | 3 | 500 | 1252 |
| 15.8% | 39.5% | 38.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1265 | 3288 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Technology support | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 106 | 227 |
| 5.3% | 8.4% | 6.9% | |
| Fair | 2 | 175 | 433 |
| 10.5% | 13.8% | 13.2% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 196 | 401 |
| 26.3% | 15.5% | 12.2% | |
| Good | 7 | 465 | 1211 |
| 36.8% | 36.7% | 36.8% | |
| Excellent | 4 | 278 | 934 |
| 21.1% | 21.9% | 28.4% | |
| N/A | 0 | 47 | 85 |
| 0.0% | 3.7% | 2.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1267 | 3291 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Professional development around the integrated use of technology in your teaching | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 2 | 179 | 378 |
| 10.5% | 14.1% | 11.5% | |
| Fair | 2 | 183 | 441 |
| 10.5% | 14.5% | 13.4% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 262 | 589 |
| 21.1% | 20.7% | 17.9% | |
| Good | 5 | 352 | 1075 |
| 26.3% | 27.8% | 32.7% | |
| Excellent | 5 | 125 | 515 |
| 26.3% | 9.9% | 15.7% | |
| N/A | 1 | 165 | 291 |
| 5.3% | 13.0% | 8.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1266 | 3289 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Support for making courses accessible to students with disabilities | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 111 | 255 |
| 5.3% | 8.8% | 7.8% | |
| Fair | 2 | 98 | 277 |
| 10.5% | 7.7% | 8.4% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 222 | 510 |
| 31.6% | 17.5% | 15.5% | |
| Good | 2 | 286 | 830 |
| 10.5% | 22.6% | 25.2% | |
| Excellent | 4 | 134 | 508 |
| 21.1% | 10.6% | 15.4% | |
| N/A | 4 | 417 | 909 |
| 21.1% | 32.9% | 27.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1268 | 3289 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Support for making teaching courses accessible to faculty with disabilities | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 0 | 62 | 174 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 5.3% | |
| Fair | 0 | 45 | 143 |
| 0.0% | 3.6% | 4.3% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 154 | 419 |
| 15.8% | 12.2% | 12.7% | |
| Good | 0 | 90 | 322 |
| 0.0% | 7.1% | 9.8% | |
| Excellent | 0 | 52 | 221 |
| 0.0% | 4.1% | 6.7% | |
| N/A | 16 | 861 | 2011 |
| 84.2% | 68.1% | 61.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1264 | 3290 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Professional development around the integrated use of technology in your research | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 5 | 186 | 426 |
| 26.3% | 14.7% | 13.0% | |
| Fair | 3 | 163 | 405 |
| 15.8% | 12.9% | 12.3% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 269 | 574 |
| 21.1% | 21.3% | 17.5% | |
| Good | 1 | 279 | 777 |
| 5.3% | 22.1% | 23.6% | |
| Excellent | 4 | 90 | 366 |
| 21.1% | 7.1% | 11.1% | |
| N/A | 2 | 278 | 741 |
| 10.5% | 22.0% | 22.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1265 | 3289 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Consultations for using technology in teaching and research | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 144 | 329 |
| 5.3% | 11.4% | 10.0% | |
| Fair | 3 | 172 | 390 |
| 15.8% | 13.6% | 11.9% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 204 | 511 |
| 15.8% | 16.1% | 15.5% | |
| Good | 7 | 374 | 1001 |
| 36.8% | 29.6% | 30.4% | |
| Excellent | 5 | 168 | 626 |
| 26.3% | 13.3% | 19.0% | |
| N/A | 0 | 203 | 431 |
| 0.0% | 16.0% | 13.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1265 | 3288 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Specialized teaching software | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 3 | 157 | 375 |
| 15.8% | 12.5% | 11.5% | |
| Fair | 1 | 162 | 421 |
| 5.3% | 12.9% | 12.9% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 270 | 631 |
| 10.5% | 21.5% | 19.3% | |
| Good | 9 | 225 | 719 |
| 47.4% | 17.9% | 22.0% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 68 | 262 |
| 5.3% | 5.4% | 8.0% | |
| N/A | 3 | 376 | 859 |
| 15.8% | 29.9% | 26.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1258 | 3267 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Locally housed high-performance computing/research computing services | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 81 | 338 |
| 5.3% | 6.4% | 10.3% | |
| Fair | 1 | 51 | 127 |
| 5.3% | 4.0% | 3.9% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 135 | 342 |
| 5.3% | 10.7% | 10.4% | |
| Good | 5 | 125 | 213 |
| 26.3% | 9.9% | 6.5% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 79 | 131 |
| 5.3% | 6.3% | 4.0% | |
| N/A | 10 | 789 | 2129 |
| 52.6% | 62.6% | 64.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1260 | 3280 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Outsourced high-performance computing (or research computing) systems | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 0 | 78 | 285 |
| 0.0% | 6.2% | 8.7% | |
| Fair | 0 | 36 | 102 |
| 0.0% | 2.9% | 3.1% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 131 | 361 |
| 5.3% | 10.4% | 11.0% | |
| Good | 2 | 47 | 123 |
| 10.5% | 3.7% | 3.8% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 29 | 60 |
| 5.3% | 2.3% | 1.8% | |
| N/A | 15 | 942 | 2349 |
| 78.9% | 74.6% | 71.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1263 | 3280 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Self-publishing | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 121 | 366 |
| 5.6% | 9.6% | 11.2% | |
| Fair | 2 | 77 | 183 |
| 11.1% | 6.1% | 5.6% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 173 | 443 |
| 16.7% | 13.7% | 13.5% | |
| Good | 2 | 89 | 230 |
| 11.1% | 7.1% | 7.0% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 32 | 82 |
| 5.6% | 2.5% | 2.5% | |
| N/A | 9 | 768 | 1975 |
| 50.0% | 61.0% | 60.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1260 | 3279 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: New models for global research collaborations | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 2 | 140 | 395 |
| 10.5% | 11.1% | 12.1% | |
| Fair | 0 | 73 | 165 |
| 0.0% | 5.8% | 5.0% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 179 | 440 |
| 21.1% | 14.2% | 13.4% | |
| Good | 0 | 67 | 167 |
| 0.0% | 5.3% | 5.1% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 21 | 57 |
| 5.3% | 1.7% | 1.7% | |
| N/A | 12 | 779 | 2053 |
| 63.2% | 61.9% | 62.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1259 | 3277 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.3. Experiences: Open content | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor | 1 | 97 | 278 |
| 5.3% | 7.7% | 8.5% | |
| Fair | 1 | 82 | 221 |
| 5.3% | 6.5% | 6.7% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 232 | 541 |
| 26.3% | 18.4% | 16.5% | |
| Good | 3 | 156 | 434 |
| 15.8% | 12.4% | 13.2% | |
| Excellent | 3 | 53 | 136 |
| 15.8% | 4.2% | 4.2% | |
| N/A | 6 | 642 | 1666 |
| 31.6% | 50.9% | 50.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1262 | 3276 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I take sufficient measures to keep my research and scholarly data secure. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 4 | 165 | 525 |
| 7.1% | 3.5% | 4.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 31 | 78 |
| 1.8% | 0.7% | 0.7% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 163 | 359 |
| 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.0% | |
| Neutral | 10 | 733 | 1968 |
| 17.9% | 15.6% | 16.4% | |
| Agree | 25 | 2361 | 5701 |
| 44.6% | 50.1% | 47.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 14 | 1257 | 3347 |
| 25.0% | 26.7% | 27.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
56 | 4710 | 11978 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I take sufficient measures to keep data about my students secure. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 134 | 274 |
| 1.8% | 2.8% | 2.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 15 | 48 |
| 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.4% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 92 | 179 |
| 5.3% | 2.0% | 1.5% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 418 | 899 |
| 10.5% | 8.9% | 7.5% | |
| Agree | 32 | 2361 | 5753 |
| 56.1% | 50.1% | 47.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 15 | 1692 | 4868 |
| 26.3% | 35.9% | 40.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4712 | 12021 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I have confidence in my institution’s ability to safeguard my personal information. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 199 | 551 |
| 8.8% | 4.2% | 4.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 298 | 705 |
| 5.3% | 6.3% | 5.9% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 563 | 1336 |
| 15.8% | 11.9% | 11.1% | |
| Neutral | 11 | 1148 | 2682 |
| 19.3% | 24.3% | 22.3% | |
| Agree | 25 | 1984 | 4993 |
| 43.9% | 41.9% | 41.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 4 | 541 | 1764 |
| 7.0% | 11.4% | 14.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4733 | 12031 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: In general, I have confidence in my institution's data privacy practices. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 6 | 255 | 615 |
| 10.5% | 5.4% | 5.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 205 | 530 |
| 1.8% | 4.3% | 4.4% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 387 | 970 |
| 15.8% | 8.2% | 8.1% | |
| Neutral | 11 | 1053 | 2440 |
| 19.3% | 22.3% | 20.3% | |
| Agree | 24 | 2167 | 5431 |
| 42.1% | 45.8% | 45.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 6 | 661 | 2045 |
| 10.5% | 14.0% | 17.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4728 | 12031 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: In general, I have confidence in my institution’s information security practices. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 6 | 227 | 569 |
| 10.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 195 | 501 |
| 1.8% | 4.1% | 4.2% | |
| Disagree | 7 | 419 | 1010 |
| 12.3% | 8.9% | 8.4% | |
| Neutral | 12 | 972 | 2293 |
| 21.1% | 20.6% | 19.1% | |
| Agree | 25 | 2250 | 5623 |
| 43.9% | 47.7% | 46.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 6 | 658 | 2027 |
| 10.5% | 13.9% | 16.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4721 | 12023 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I understand relevant university policies about free online data storage. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 3 | 157 | 457 |
| 16.7% | 12.5% | 13.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 4 | 120 | 334 |
| 22.2% | 9.5% | 10.2% | |
| Disagree | 4 | 290 | 716 |
| 22.2% | 23.0% | 21.8% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 220 | 546 |
| 11.1% | 17.4% | 16.6% | |
| Agree | 5 | 368 | 919 |
| 27.8% | 29.2% | 28.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 106 | 314 |
| 0.0% | 8.4% | 9.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1261 | 3286 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I understand relevant university policies and state and federal laws about data protection. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 51 | 130 |
| 11.1% | 4.0% | 4.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 28 | 92 |
| 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.8% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 106 | 237 |
| 5.6% | 8.4% | 7.2% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 182 | 412 |
| 33.3% | 14.4% | 12.5% | |
| Agree | 7 | 569 | 1520 |
| 38.9% | 44.9% | 46.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 330 | 900 |
| 11.1% | 26.1% | 27.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1266 | 3291 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I have access to all the resources I need to keep my research and scholarly data secure. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 170 | 504 |
| 27.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 75 | 164 |
| 5.6% | 5.9% | 5.0% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 120 | 307 |
| 0.0% | 9.5% | 9.4% | |
| Neutral | 7 | 295 | 750 |
| 38.9% | 23.3% | 22.9% | |
| Agree | 5 | 453 | 1148 |
| 27.8% | 35.8% | 35.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 152 | 407 |
| 0.0% | 12.0% | 12.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1265 | 3280 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: I have access to all the resources I need to keep my personal data and information secure. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 149 | 387 |
| 27.8% | 11.8% | 11.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 75 | 190 |
| 0.0% | 5.9% | 5.8% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 146 | 354 |
| 11.1% | 11.6% | 10.8% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 313 | 734 |
| 33.3% | 24.8% | 22.3% | |
| Agree | 4 | 441 | 1242 |
| 22.2% | 34.9% | 37.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 1 | 139 | 379 |
| 5.6% | 11.0% | 11.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1263 | 3286 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: My institution has mandatory information security training regarding institutional data. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 9 | 328 | 806 |
| 50.0% | 26.0% | 24.5% | |
| Strongly disagree | 4 | 116 | 355 |
| 22.2% | 9.2% | 10.8% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 173 | 501 |
| 11.1% | 13.7% | 15.3% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 155 | 388 |
| 5.6% | 12.3% | 11.8% | |
| Agree | 2 | 328 | 794 |
| 11.1% | 26.0% | 24.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 162 | 441 |
| 0.0% | 12.8% | 13.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1262 | 3285 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: My institution offers optional information security training regarding institutional data. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 10 | 495 | 1200 |
| 55.6% | 39.4% | 36.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 70 | 226 |
| 11.1% | 5.6% | 6.9% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 117 | 349 |
| 11.1% | 9.3% | 10.6% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 204 | 512 |
| 5.6% | 16.2% | 15.6% | |
| Agree | 3 | 280 | 739 |
| 16.7% | 22.3% | 22.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 91 | 254 |
| 0.0% | 7.2% | 7.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1257 | 3280 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: My institution’s privacy and security policies impede my productivity. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 4 | 104 | 275 |
| 23.5% | 8.2% | 8.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 242 | 659 |
| 17.6% | 19.2% | 20.1% | |
| Disagree | 6 | 447 | 1218 |
| 35.3% | 35.4% | 37.1% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 270 | 622 |
| 17.6% | 21.4% | 19.0% | |
| Agree | 1 | 132 | 348 |
| 5.9% | 10.5% | 10.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 66 | 159 |
| 0.0% | 5.2% | 4.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1261 | 3281 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.5. Privacy and security: My institution’s intellectual property policies impede my productivity. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 183 | 487 |
| 27.8% | 14.4% | 14.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 202 | 571 |
| 5.6% | 15.9% | 17.4% | |
| Disagree | 7 | 434 | 1113 |
| 38.9% | 34.3% | 33.9% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 291 | 718 |
| 16.7% | 23.0% | 21.9% | |
| Agree | 2 | 109 | 270 |
| 11.1% | 8.6% | 8.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 48 | 125 |
| 0.0% | 3.8% | 3.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1267 | 3284 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.6. Using student data to create individualized messages about academic progress, training, and guidance opportunities | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 5 | 635 | 1398 |
| 8.8% | 13.5% | 11.6% | |
| Bad idea | 13 | 1011 | 2413 |
| 22.8% | 21.4% | 20.1% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 13 | 1462 | 3644 |
| 22.8% | 31.0% | 30.3% | |
| Good idea | 20 | 1341 | 3725 |
| 35.1% | 28.4% | 31.0% | |
| Very good idea | 6 | 267 | 843 |
| 10.5% | 5.7% | 7.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4716 | 12023 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ performance in past courses | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 2 | 117 | 265 |
| 10.5% | 9.3% | 8.1% | |
| Bad idea | 0 | 135 | 323 |
| 0.0% | 10.7% | 9.9% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 6 | 253 | 629 |
| 31.6% | 20.1% | 19.2% | |
| Good idea | 9 | 560 | 1503 |
| 47.4% | 44.6% | 45.9% | |
| Very good idea | 2 | 191 | 555 |
| 10.5% | 15.2% | 16.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1256 | 3275 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ performance in current courses | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 2 | 92 | 212 |
| 10.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | |
| Bad idea | 0 | 112 | 267 |
| 0.0% | 8.9% | 8.1% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 3 | 213 | 495 |
| 15.8% | 16.9% | 15.1% | |
| Good idea | 10 | 592 | 1587 |
| 52.6% | 47.0% | 48.4% | |
| Very good idea | 4 | 251 | 717 |
| 21.1% | 19.9% | 21.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1260 | 3278 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ progress toward degree or certificate goal | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 0 | 57 | 131 |
| 0.0% | 4.5% | 4.0% | |
| Bad idea | 1 | 55 | 129 |
| 5.3% | 4.4% | 3.9% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 3 | 180 | 420 |
| 15.8% | 14.3% | 12.8% | |
| Good idea | 8 | 632 | 1651 |
| 42.1% | 50.2% | 50.4% | |
| Very good idea | 7 | 336 | 942 |
| 36.8% | 26.7% | 28.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1260 | 3273 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ performance in individual courses compared to the performance of others | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 5 | 161 | 404 |
| 26.3% | 12.8% | 12.3% | |
| Bad idea | 3 | 197 | 517 |
| 15.8% | 15.7% | 15.8% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 1 | 251 | 697 |
| 5.3% | 20.0% | 21.3% | |
| Good idea | 7 | 486 | 1215 |
| 36.8% | 38.6% | 37.1% | |
| Very good idea | 3 | 163 | 442 |
| 15.8% | 13.0% | 13.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1258 | 3275 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ activity on a college or university website | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 4 | 280 | 615 |
| 21.1% | 22.4% | 18.8% | |
| Bad idea | 5 | 270 | 622 |
| 26.3% | 21.6% | 19.1% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 6 | 315 | 834 |
| 31.6% | 25.2% | 25.5% | |
| Good idea | 4 | 319 | 945 |
| 21.1% | 25.5% | 28.9% | |
| Very good idea | 0 | 65 | 249 |
| 0.0% | 5.2% | 7.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1249 | 3265 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ activity in a specific application or service provided by the institution | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 4 | 193 | 411 |
| 21.1% | 15.4% | 12.6% | |
| Bad idea | 2 | 189 | 440 |
| 10.5% | 15.1% | 13.5% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 8 | 383 | 927 |
| 42.1% | 30.6% | 28.4% | |
| Good idea | 4 | 378 | 1165 |
| 21.1% | 30.2% | 35.7% | |
| Very good idea | 1 | 108 | 319 |
| 5.3% | 8.6% | 9.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1251 | 3262 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ campus-based activities logged through student ID/smart cards | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 6 | 323 | 674 |
| 31.6% | 25.6% | 20.6% | |
| Bad idea | 4 | 296 | 704 |
| 21.1% | 23.5% | 21.5% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 4 | 305 | 841 |
| 21.1% | 24.2% | 25.7% | |
| Good idea | 5 | 274 | 828 |
| 26.3% | 21.7% | 25.3% | |
| Very good idea | 0 | 62 | 230 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 7.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1260 | 3277 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ campus-based activities logged through smartphones | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 8 | 415 | 915 |
| 42.1% | 32.9% | 27.9% | |
| Bad idea | 5 | 323 | 820 |
| 26.3% | 25.6% | 25.0% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 4 | 293 | 793 |
| 21.1% | 23.2% | 24.2% | |
| Good idea | 2 | 195 | 595 |
| 10.5% | 15.5% | 18.2% | |
| Very good idea | 0 | 36 | 151 |
| 0.0% | 2.9% | 4.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1262 | 3274 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ location on campus | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 10 | 506 | 1163 |
| 52.6% | 40.3% | 35.6% | |
| Bad idea | 4 | 338 | 898 |
| 21.1% | 26.9% | 27.5% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 3 | 258 | 708 |
| 15.8% | 20.6% | 21.6% | |
| Good idea | 2 | 126 | 388 |
| 10.5% | 10.0% | 11.9% | |
| Very good idea | 0 | 27 | 114 |
| 0.0% | 2.2% | 3.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1255 | 3271 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ proximity to a college building, office, or resource | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 10 | 453 | 1053 |
| 52.6% | 36.0% | 32.2% | |
| Bad idea | 4 | 333 | 852 |
| 21.1% | 26.5% | 26.0% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 4 | 296 | 826 |
| 21.1% | 23.5% | 25.2% | |
| Good idea | 1 | 146 | 423 |
| 5.3% | 11.6% | 12.9% | |
| Very good idea | 0 | 30 | 119 |
| 0.0% | 2.4% | 3.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1258 | 3273 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.7. Collecting data from/about students’ social-media activities | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 8 | 550 | 1285 |
| 44.4% | 43.7% | 39.3% | |
| Bad idea | 4 | 407 | 999 |
| 22.2% | 32.3% | 30.5% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 5 | 174 | 580 |
| 27.8% | 13.8% | 17.7% | |
| Good idea | 1 | 104 | 311 |
| 5.6% | 8.3% | 9.5% | |
| Very good idea | 0 | 24 | 98 |
| 0.0% | 1.9% | 3.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1259 | 3273 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.8. Combining data about students’ school-related activities with their social-media and mobile-device data | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Very bad idea | 14 | 1141 | 2553 |
| 24.1% | 24.3% | 21.3% | |
| Bad idea | 24 | 1534 | 3674 |
| 41.4% | 32.6% | 30.7% | |
| Neither good nor bad | 11 | 1117 | 2891 |
| 19.0% | 23.8% | 24.1% | |
| Good idea | 8 | 779 | 2366 |
| 13.8% | 16.6% | 19.7% | |
| Very good idea | 1 | 128 | 499 |
| 1.7% | 2.7% | 4.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
58 | 4699 | 11983 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.9. Online learning helps students learn more effectively | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 36 | 79 |
| 5.3% | 2.8% | 2.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 217 | 540 |
| 15.8% | 17.1% | 16.4% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 310 | 779 |
| 10.5% | 24.5% | 23.6% | |
| Neutral | 9 | 424 | 1047 |
| 47.4% | 33.5% | 31.8% | |
| Agree | 2 | 197 | 583 |
| 10.5% | 15.6% | 17.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 82 | 266 |
| 10.5% | 6.5% | 8.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1266 | 3294 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.9. Online learning will lead to pedagogical breakthroughs | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 39 | 110 |
| 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 174 | 430 |
| 15.8% | 13.8% | 13.1% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 268 | 609 |
| 15.8% | 21.2% | 18.5% | |
| Neutral | 7 | 370 | 979 |
| 36.8% | 29.3% | 29.7% | |
| Agree | 4 | 296 | 798 |
| 21.1% | 23.4% | 24.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 117 | 367 |
| 10.5% | 9.3% | 11.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1264 | 3293 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.9. Online learning will make higher education available to more students | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 13 | 29 |
| 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 54 | 143 |
| 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.3% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 109 | 233 |
| 15.8% | 8.6% | 7.1% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 187 | 437 |
| 26.3% | 14.8% | 13.3% | |
| Agree | 8 | 640 | 1579 |
| 42.1% | 50.6% | 48.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 261 | 872 |
| 15.8% | 20.6% | 26.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
19 | 1264 | 3293 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
For question 2.11, respondents ranked up to ten items 1–10, with 1 representing the action done first.
The values reported here are the average rank of each item and the number of respondents ranking each item.
| 2.11. Tech support or assistance | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ask your friends | Mean | 5.5 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| N | 23 | 1596 | 4053 | |
| Ask your family | Mean | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| N | 23 | 1579 | 4112 | |
| Ask your peers or colleagues | Mean | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| N | 39 | 3555 | 9116 | |
| Ask teaching or research assistants | Mean | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.2 |
| N | 25 | 1685 | 3605 | |
| Ask your students | Mean | 6.0 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| N | 20 | 1643 | 4275 | |
| Search Google, YouTube, or another online source | Mean | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
| N | 43 | 3583 | 8732 | |
| Contact the company or vendor | Mean | 6.5 | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| N | 20 | 1765 | 4458 | |
| Use the college/university help desk services | Mean | 3.2 | 3.1 | 2.9 |
| N | 47 | 3971 | 10362 | |
| Figure it out on your own | Mean | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| N | 48 | 3943 | 10115 | |
| Other | Mean | 7.9 | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| N | 11 | 989 | 2459 | |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Walk-in | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 3 | 77 | 237 |
| 16.7% | 6.2% | 7.3% | |
| N/A | 5 | 531 | 1133 |
| 27.8% | 42.5% | 34.9% | |
| Poor | 1 | 57 | 139 |
| 5.6% | 4.6% | 4.3% | |
| Fair | 1 | 53 | 161 |
| 5.6% | 4.2% | 5.0% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 126 | 307 |
| 22.2% | 10.1% | 9.5% | |
| Good | 3 | 256 | 720 |
| 16.7% | 20.5% | 22.2% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 148 | 549 |
| 5.6% | 11.9% | 16.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1248 | 3246 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Phone | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 0 | 23 | 47 |
| 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.4% | |
| N/A | 4 | 184 | 320 |
| 22.2% | 14.6% | 9.8% | |
| Poor | 1 | 84 | 190 |
| 5.6% | 6.7% | 5.8% | |
| Fair | 3 | 111 | 300 |
| 16.7% | 8.8% | 9.2% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 129 | 325 |
| 11.1% | 10.2% | 9.9% | |
| Good | 5 | 446 | 1190 |
| 27.8% | 35.4% | 36.3% | |
| Excellent | 3 | 283 | 906 |
| 16.7% | 22.5% | 27.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1260 | 3278 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: E-mail | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 1 | 27 | 64 |
| 5.6% | 2.1% | 2.0% | |
| N/A | 2 | 119 | 275 |
| 11.1% | 9.5% | 8.4% | |
| Poor | 3 | 82 | 219 |
| 16.7% | 6.5% | 6.7% | |
| Fair | 2 | 129 | 338 |
| 11.1% | 10.3% | 10.3% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 155 | 363 |
| 11.1% | 12.3% | 11.1% | |
| Good | 6 | 501 | 1294 |
| 33.3% | 39.9% | 39.6% | |
| Excellent | 2 | 243 | 714 |
| 11.1% | 19.3% | 21.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1256 | 3267 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Web form | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 1 | 76 | 268 |
| 5.6% | 6.1% | 8.3% | |
| N/A | 3 | 398 | 978 |
| 16.7% | 32.0% | 30.3% | |
| Poor | 2 | 117 | 271 |
| 11.1% | 9.4% | 8.4% | |
| Fair | 3 | 101 | 270 |
| 16.7% | 8.1% | 8.4% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 197 | 495 |
| 5.6% | 15.8% | 15.3% | |
| Good | 7 | 260 | 662 |
| 38.9% | 20.9% | 20.5% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 94 | 287 |
| 5.6% | 7.6% | 8.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1243 | 3231 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Chat/IM | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 10 | 243 | 704 |
| 55.6% | 19.5% | 21.8% | |
| N/A | 6 | 687 | 1555 |
| 33.3% | 55.1% | 48.2% | |
| Poor | 0 | 47 | 105 |
| 0.0% | 3.8% | 3.3% | |
| Fair | 0 | 22 | 84 |
| 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.6% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 117 | 319 |
| 5.6% | 9.4% | 9.9% | |
| Good | 0 | 94 | 298 |
| 0.0% | 7.5% | 9.2% | |
| Excellent | 1 | 36 | 158 |
| 5.6% | 2.9% | 4.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1246 | 3223 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Remote assistance/desktop | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 5 | 115 | 316 |
| 29.4% | 9.2% | 9.8% | |
| N/A | 6 | 516 | 1101 |
| 35.3% | 41.4% | 34.0% | |
| Poor | 0 | 50 | 131 |
| 0.0% | 4.0% | 4.1% | |
| Fair | 1 | 61 | 164 |
| 5.9% | 4.9% | 5.1% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 111 | 317 |
| 17.6% | 8.9% | 9.8% | |
| Good | 0 | 241 | 713 |
| 0.0% | 19.3% | 22.0% | |
| Excellent | 2 | 152 | 492 |
| 11.8% | 12.2% | 15.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1246 | 3234 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Self-service FAQ | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 0 | 62 | 254 |
| 0.0% | 5.0% | 7.9% | |
| N/A | 3 | 293 | 786 |
| 16.7% | 23.5% | 24.4% | |
| Poor | 5 | 185 | 410 |
| 27.8% | 14.8% | 12.7% | |
| Fair | 3 | 185 | 419 |
| 16.7% | 14.8% | 13.0% | |
| Neutral | 7 | 246 | 607 |
| 38.9% | 19.7% | 18.8% | |
| Good | 0 | 227 | 589 |
| 0.0% | 18.2% | 18.3% | |
| Excellent | 0 | 48 | 161 |
| 0.0% | 3.9% | 5.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1246 | 3226 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.12. Help desk services: Overall | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not offered | 0 | 24 | 42 |
| 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.3% | |
| N/A | 2 | 182 | 312 |
| 3.5% | 3.9% | 2.6% | |
| Poor | 6 | 276 | 598 |
| 10.5% | 5.9% | 5.0% | |
| Fair | 7 | 510 | 1199 |
| 12.3% | 10.8% | 10.0% | |
| Neutral | 8 | 573 | 1248 |
| 14.0% | 12.2% | 10.4% | |
| Good | 22 | 2071 | 5324 |
| 38.6% | 43.9% | 44.4% | |
| Excellent | 12 | 1079 | 3280 |
| 21.1% | 22.9% | 27.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4715 | 12003 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution maintains a highly qualified IT staff. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 105 | 245 |
| 5.6% | 8.3% | 7.5% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 91 | 207 |
| 5.6% | 7.2% | 6.3% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 122 | 303 |
| 11.1% | 9.7% | 9.2% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 247 | 596 |
| 22.2% | 19.6% | 18.2% | |
| Agree | 7 | 507 | 1335 |
| 38.9% | 40.3% | 40.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 187 | 593 |
| 16.7% | 14.9% | 18.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1259 | 3279 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution facilitates the use of technology in collaboration with academic leadership. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 159 | 299 |
| 11.1% | 12.6% | 9.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 121 | 295 |
| 5.6% | 9.6% | 9.0% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 238 | 523 |
| 5.6% | 18.9% | 16.0% | |
| Neutral | 7 | 284 | 713 |
| 38.9% | 22.6% | 21.8% | |
| Agree | 4 | 380 | 1169 |
| 22.2% | 30.2% | 35.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 76 | 271 |
| 16.7% | 6.0% | 8.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1258 | 3270 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution funds IT strategically. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 7 | 504 | 1260 |
| 38.9% | 40.1% | 38.5% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 153 | 376 |
| 5.6% | 12.2% | 11.5% | |
| Disagree | 4 | 177 | 464 |
| 22.2% | 14.1% | 14.2% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 232 | 582 |
| 5.6% | 18.4% | 17.8% | |
| Agree | 3 | 145 | 462 |
| 16.7% | 11.5% | 14.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 47 | 129 |
| 11.1% | 3.7% | 3.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1258 | 3273 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution improves student outcomes through an approach that uses technology. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 4 | 261 | 525 |
| 22.2% | 20.8% | 16.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 90 | 226 |
| 5.6% | 7.2% | 6.9% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 182 | 472 |
| 16.7% | 14.5% | 14.5% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 348 | 812 |
| 16.7% | 27.7% | 24.9% | |
| Agree | 7 | 325 | 1013 |
| 38.9% | 25.9% | 31.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 50 | 217 |
| 0.0% | 4.0% | 6.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1256 | 3265 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution demonstrates the business value of information technology. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 3 | 419 | 987 |
| 16.7% | 33.3% | 30.2% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 108 | 259 |
| 0.0% | 8.6% | 7.9% | |
| Disagree | 5 | 188 | 487 |
| 27.8% | 15.0% | 14.9% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 288 | 719 |
| 27.8% | 22.9% | 22.0% | |
| Agree | 2 | 195 | 635 |
| 11.1% | 15.5% | 19.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 59 | 179 |
| 16.7% | 4.7% | 5.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1257 | 3266 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution demonstrates how technology and the IT organization can help the institution achieve its goals. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 226 | 518 |
| 11.1% | 18.0% | 15.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 152 | 328 |
| 0.0% | 12.1% | 10.0% | |
| Disagree | 5 | 246 | 619 |
| 27.8% | 19.6% | 18.9% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 314 | 780 |
| 27.8% | 25.0% | 23.9% | |
| Agree | 4 | 267 | 840 |
| 22.2% | 21.3% | 25.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 51 | 182 |
| 11.1% | 4.1% | 5.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1256 | 3267 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution increases the IT organization’s capacity for managing change. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 407 | 951 |
| 27.8% | 32.3% | 29.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 139 | 328 |
| 0.0% | 11.0% | 10.0% | |
| Disagree | 5 | 202 | 513 |
| 27.8% | 16.0% | 15.7% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 268 | 687 |
| 22.2% | 21.2% | 21.0% | |
| Agree | 4 | 205 | 634 |
| 22.2% | 16.2% | 19.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 41 | 158 |
| 0.0% | 3.2% | 4.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1262 | 3271 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution provides user support for mobile, online education, cloud, and BYOD environments. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 6 | 279 | 648 |
| 33.3% | 22.2% | 19.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 119 | 274 |
| 5.6% | 9.5% | 8.4% | |
| Disagree | 4 | 189 | 495 |
| 22.2% | 15.0% | 15.1% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 273 | 713 |
| 5.6% | 21.7% | 21.8% | |
| Agree | 6 | 339 | 940 |
| 33.3% | 27.0% | 28.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 57 | 198 |
| 0.0% | 4.5% | 6.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1256 | 3268 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution is developing mobile, cloud, and digital security policies that work for most …. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 10 | 514 | 1315 |
| 55.6% | 40.8% | 40.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 91 | 206 |
| 0.0% | 7.2% | 6.3% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 115 | 357 |
| 11.1% | 9.1% | 10.9% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 270 | 647 |
| 16.7% | 21.4% | 19.7% | |
| Agree | 3 | 228 | 602 |
| 16.7% | 18.1% | 18.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 43 | 150 |
| 0.0% | 3.4% | 4.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1261 | 3277 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution has an agile approach to IT infrastructure that can respond …. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 293 | 716 |
| 27.8% | 23.3% | 21.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 222 | 501 |
| 11.1% | 17.6% | 15.3% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 238 | 621 |
| 16.7% | 18.9% | 19.0% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 242 | 638 |
| 16.7% | 19.2% | 19.5% | |
| Agree | 4 | 209 | 627 |
| 22.2% | 16.6% | 19.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 1 | 54 | 169 |
| 5.6% | 4.3% | 5.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1258 | 3272 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution facilitates a better understanding of information privacy and security. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 182 | 492 |
| 11.1% | 14.5% | 15.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 114 | 258 |
| 5.6% | 9.1% | 7.9% | |
| Disagree | 6 | 231 | 578 |
| 33.3% | 18.3% | 17.7% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 339 | 876 |
| 22.2% | 26.9% | 26.8% | |
| Agree | 5 | 345 | 887 |
| 27.8% | 27.4% | 27.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 48 | 178 |
| 0.0% | 3.8% | 5.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1259 | 3269 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution is committed to supporting accessible or adaptive technologies for students with disabilities. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 6 | 480 | 1068 |
| 33.3% | 38.1% | 32.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 52 | 142 |
| 0.0% | 4.1% | 4.3% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 66 | 182 |
| 5.6% | 5.2% | 5.6% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 200 | 543 |
| 33.3% | 15.9% | 16.6% | |
| Agree | 4 | 356 | 977 |
| 22.2% | 28.3% | 29.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 1 | 105 | 364 |
| 5.6% | 8.3% | 11.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1259 | 3276 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2.13. My institution supports faculty technology needs. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 24 | 67 |
| 5.6% | 1.9% | 2.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 148 | 342 |
| 11.1% | 11.7% | 10.4% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 195 | 477 |
| 16.7% | 15.5% | 14.5% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 301 | 686 |
| 16.7% | 23.9% | 20.9% | |
| Agree | 7 | 497 | 1343 |
| 38.9% | 39.4% | 40.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 95 | 365 |
| 11.1% | 7.5% | 11.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
18 | 1260 | 3280 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.1. Agree/disagree: I wish my students were better prepared to use institutionally specific technology. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 220 | 407 |
| 3.8% | 5.1% | 3.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 178 | 390 |
| 5.7% | 4.2% | 3.4% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 829 | 1734 |
| 17.0% | 19.3% | 15.1% | |
| Neutral | 16 | 1180 | 2829 |
| 30.2% | 27.5% | 24.7% | |
| Agree | 16 | 1364 | 4222 |
| 30.2% | 31.8% | 36.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 7 | 514 | 1868 |
| 13.2% | 12.0% | 16.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
53 | 4285 | 11450 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.1. Agree/disagree: I wish my students were better prepared to use basic software programs and applications. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 135 | 274 |
| 0.0% | 3.1% | 2.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 7 | 334 | 663 |
| 13.2% | 7.8% | 5.8% | |
| Disagree | 13 | 1119 | 2465 |
| 24.5% | 26.1% | 21.5% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 1124 | 2877 |
| 26.4% | 26.2% | 25.1% | |
| Agree | 13 | 1082 | 3422 |
| 24.5% | 25.2% | 29.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 6 | 496 | 1761 |
| 11.3% | 11.6% | 15.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
53 | 4290 | 11462 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.1. Agree/disagree: Most of my students have adequate technology skills for carrying out course activities. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 12 | 19 |
| 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 47 | 142 |
| 0.0% | 4.0% | 4.5% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 207 | 581 |
| 5.9% | 17.7% | 18.3% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 176 | 526 |
| 11.8% | 15.1% | 16.6% | |
| Agree | 12 | 589 | 1605 |
| 70.6% | 50.4% | 50.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 138 | 302 |
| 11.8% | 11.8% | 9.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1169 | 3175 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.1. Agree/disagree: Too many of my students look to me or my TAs for technology support to fulfill course requirements. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 49 | 120 |
| 0.0% | 4.2% | 3.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 113 | 298 |
| 0.0% | 9.6% | 9.4% | |
| Disagree | 11 | 402 | 1005 |
| 64.7% | 34.3% | 31.7% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 217 | 614 |
| 17.6% | 18.5% | 19.3% | |
| Agree | 3 | 269 | 796 |
| 17.6% | 23.0% | 25.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 121 | 342 |
| 0.0% | 10.3% | 10.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1171 | 3175 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Guidance about courses students might consider taking in the future | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 164 | 341 |
| 1.9% | 3.8% | 3.0% | |
| Not at all interested | 8 | 609 | 1357 |
| 15.4% | 14.3% | 11.9% | |
| Not very interested | 10 | 922 | 2095 |
| 19.2% | 21.6% | 18.4% | |
| Moderately interested | 12 | 1529 | 3957 |
| 23.1% | 35.8% | 34.7% | |
| Very interested | 15 | 801 | 2624 |
| 28.8% | 18.8% | 23.0% | |
| Extremely interested | 6 | 246 | 1023 |
| 11.5% | 5.8% | 9.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
52 | 4271 | 11397 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Alerts if it appears a student’s progress in a course is declining | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 123 | 222 |
| 1.9% | 2.9% | 1.9% | |
| Not at all interested | 4 | 464 | 914 |
| 7.5% | 10.9% | 8.0% | |
| Not very interested | 3 | 614 | 1327 |
| 5.7% | 14.4% | 11.6% | |
| Moderately interested | 14 | 1484 | 3533 |
| 26.4% | 34.7% | 31.0% | |
| Very interested | 22 | 1220 | 3793 |
| 41.5% | 28.5% | 33.3% | |
| Extremely interested | 9 | 369 | 1614 |
| 17.0% | 8.6% | 14.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
53 | 4274 | 11403 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Suggestions for how to improve performance in a course … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 124 | 236 |
| 1.9% | 2.9% | 2.1% | |
| Not at all interested | 5 | 463 | 924 |
| 9.3% | 10.8% | 8.1% | |
| Not very interested | 4 | 611 | 1298 |
| 7.4% | 14.3% | 11.4% | |
| Moderately interested | 16 | 1542 | 3795 |
| 29.6% | 36.1% | 33.3% | |
| Very interested | 17 | 1181 | 3724 |
| 31.5% | 27.7% | 32.7% | |
| Extremely interested | 11 | 350 | 1417 |
| 20.4% | 8.2% | 12.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4271 | 11394 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Suggestions about new or different academic resources for your students | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 39 | 69 |
| 6.3% | 3.4% | 2.2% | |
| Not at all interested | 1 | 85 | 181 |
| 6.3% | 7.3% | 5.7% | |
| Not very interested | 1 | 110 | 227 |
| 6.3% | 9.5% | 7.2% | |
| Moderately interested | 5 | 405 | 1031 |
| 31.3% | 34.9% | 32.7% | |
| Very interested | 3 | 387 | 1127 |
| 18.8% | 33.3% | 35.7% | |
| Extremely interested | 5 | 136 | 519 |
| 31.3% | 11.7% | 16.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
16 | 1162 | 3154 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Automated tracking of course attendance … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 46 | 112 |
| 5.9% | 4.0% | 3.6% | |
| Not at all interested | 4 | 296 | 719 |
| 23.5% | 25.5% | 22.8% | |
| Not very interested | 4 | 230 | 580 |
| 23.5% | 19.8% | 18.4% | |
| Moderately interested | 1 | 258 | 672 |
| 5.9% | 22.2% | 21.3% | |
| Very interested | 3 | 180 | 602 |
| 17.6% | 15.5% | 19.1% | |
| Extremely interested | 4 | 153 | 467 |
| 23.5% | 13.2% | 14.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1163 | 3152 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Personalized support and information on your students’ progress toward their degree goals | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 50 | 97 |
| 5.9% | 4.3% | 3.1% | |
| Not at all interested | 0 | 149 | 292 |
| 0.0% | 12.8% | 9.3% | |
| Not very interested | 4 | 164 | 368 |
| 23.5% | 14.1% | 11.7% | |
| Moderately interested | 3 | 390 | 1009 |
| 17.6% | 33.5% | 32.0% | |
| Very interested | 2 | 299 | 981 |
| 11.8% | 25.7% | 31.1% | |
| Extremely interested | 7 | 113 | 405 |
| 41.2% | 9.7% | 12.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1165 | 3152 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Personalized quizzes or practice questions oriented to your students … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 50 | 114 |
| 5.9% | 4.3% | 3.6% | |
| Not at all interested | 0 | 202 | 488 |
| 0.0% | 17.4% | 15.5% | |
| Not very interested | 4 | 227 | 548 |
| 23.5% | 19.5% | 17.4% | |
| Moderately interested | 6 | 324 | 852 |
| 35.3% | 27.9% | 27.0% | |
| Very interested | 4 | 256 | 785 |
| 23.5% | 22.0% | 24.9% | |
| Extremely interested | 2 | 104 | 365 |
| 11.8% | 8.9% | 11.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1163 | 3152 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Personalized dashboards that give students real-time feedback about their progress | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 52 | 102 |
| 6.3% | 4.5% | 3.2% | |
| Not at all interested | 1 | 161 | 347 |
| 6.3% | 13.8% | 11.0% | |
| Not very interested | 1 | 157 | 368 |
| 6.3% | 13.5% | 11.7% | |
| Moderately interested | 5 | 393 | 961 |
| 31.3% | 33.8% | 30.5% | |
| Very interested | 4 | 291 | 903 |
| 25.0% | 25.0% | 28.6% | |
| Extremely interested | 4 | 110 | 473 |
| 25.0% | 9.5% | 15.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
16 | 1164 | 3154 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.3. Alerts and notifications: Personalized dashboards that give you real-time feedback about students’ progress | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 56 | 112 |
| 11.8% | 4.8% | 3.6% | |
| Not at all interested | 0 | 181 | 392 |
| 0.0% | 15.6% | 12.4% | |
| Not very interested | 3 | 182 | 431 |
| 17.6% | 15.6% | 13.7% | |
| Moderately interested | 6 | 361 | 931 |
| 35.3% | 31.0% | 29.5% | |
| Very interested | 3 | 275 | 874 |
| 17.6% | 23.6% | 27.7% | |
| Extremely interested | 3 | 108 | 412 |
| 17.6% | 9.3% | 13.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1163 | 3152 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Guidance about courses students might consider taking in the future | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 10 | 444 | 1286 |
| 58.8% | 38.2% | 41.0% | |
| Don’t know | 4 | 408 | 919 |
| 23.5% | 35.1% | 29.3% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 60 | 132 |
| 5.9% | 5.2% | 4.2% | |
| Not very useful | 0 | 78 | 154 |
| 0.0% | 6.7% | 4.9% | |
| Moderately useful | 2 | 99 | 306 |
| 11.8% | 8.5% | 9.7% | |
| Very useful | 0 | 54 | 240 |
| 0.0% | 4.7% | 7.6% | |
| Extremely useful | 0 | 18 | 103 |
| 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1161 | 3140 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Alerts if it appears a student’s progress in a course is declining | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 6 | 413 | 1073 |
| 35.3% | 35.6% | 34.3% | |
| Don’t know | 2 | 347 | 716 |
| 11.8% | 29.9% | 22.9% | |
| Not at all useful | 0 | 51 | 124 |
| 0.0% | 4.4% | 4.0% | |
| Not very useful | 1 | 81 | 226 |
| 5.9% | 7.0% | 7.2% | |
| Moderately useful | 5 | 156 | 482 |
| 29.4% | 13.4% | 15.4% | |
| Very useful | 2 | 82 | 334 |
| 11.8% | 7.1% | 10.7% | |
| Extremely useful | 1 | 31 | 175 |
| 5.9% | 2.7% | 5.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1161 | 3130 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Suggestions for how to improve performance in a course … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 10 | 467 | 1260 |
| 58.8% | 40.2% | 40.2% | |
| Don’t know | 3 | 362 | 801 |
| 17.6% | 31.2% | 25.6% | |
| Not at all useful | 0 | 53 | 119 |
| 0.0% | 4.6% | 3.8% | |
| Not very useful | 0 | 84 | 195 |
| 0.0% | 7.2% | 6.2% | |
| Moderately useful | 3 | 113 | 373 |
| 17.6% | 9.7% | 11.9% | |
| Very useful | 1 | 60 | 263 |
| 5.9% | 5.2% | 8.4% | |
| Extremely useful | 0 | 22 | 122 |
| 0.0% | 1.9% | 3.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1161 | 3133 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Suggestions about new or different academic resources for your students | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 7 | 326 | 823 |
| 41.2% | 28.1% | 26.3% | |
| Don’t know | 2 | 408 | 852 |
| 11.8% | 35.1% | 27.2% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 37 | 80 |
| 5.9% | 3.2% | 2.6% | |
| Not very useful | 1 | 77 | 187 |
| 5.9% | 6.6% | 6.0% | |
| Moderately useful | 4 | 185 | 576 |
| 23.5% | 15.9% | 18.4% | |
| Very useful | 1 | 100 | 444 |
| 5.9% | 8.6% | 14.2% | |
| Extremely useful | 1 | 29 | 168 |
| 5.9% | 2.5% | 5.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1162 | 3130 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Automated tracking of your students’ course attendance … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 12 | 557 | 1598 |
| 70.6% | 48.0% | 50.9% | |
| Don’t know | 2 | 304 | 625 |
| 11.8% | 26.2% | 19.9% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 77 | 185 |
| 5.9% | 6.6% | 5.9% | |
| Not very useful | 0 | 60 | 155 |
| 0.0% | 5.2% | 4.9% | |
| Moderately useful | 2 | 91 | 246 |
| 11.8% | 7.8% | 7.8% | |
| Very useful | 0 | 54 | 207 |
| 0.0% | 4.7% | 6.6% | |
| Extremely useful | 0 | 18 | 123 |
| 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1161 | 3139 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Personalized support and information on your students’ progress toward their degree goals | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 8 | 347 | 900 |
| 47.1% | 29.9% | 28.7% | |
| Don’t know | 2 | 397 | 905 |
| 11.8% | 34.3% | 28.9% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 48 | 113 |
| 5.9% | 4.1% | 3.6% | |
| Not very useful | 0 | 81 | 177 |
| 0.0% | 7.0% | 5.7% | |
| Moderately useful | 2 | 167 | 510 |
| 11.8% | 14.4% | 16.3% | |
| Very useful | 3 | 86 | 367 |
| 17.6% | 7.4% | 11.7% | |
| Extremely useful | 1 | 33 | 160 |
| 5.9% | 2.8% | 5.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1159 | 3132 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Personalized quizzes or practice questions oriented to your students … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 9 | 509 | 1421 |
| 52.9% | 43.9% | 45.4% | |
| Don’t know | 5 | 359 | 778 |
| 29.4% | 31.0% | 24.8% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 66 | 157 |
| 5.9% | 5.7% | 5.0% | |
| Not very useful | 0 | 56 | 147 |
| 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | |
| Moderately useful | 2 | 90 | 291 |
| 11.8% | 7.8% | 9.3% | |
| Very useful | 0 | 58 | 226 |
| 0.0% | 5.0% | 7.2% | |
| Extremely useful | 0 | 21 | 112 |
| 0.0% | 1.8% | 3.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1159 | 3132 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Personalized dashboards that give students real-time feedback about their progress | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 8 | 389 | 1105 |
| 47.1% | 33.7% | 35.3% | |
| Don’t know | 2 | 385 | 826 |
| 11.8% | 33.3% | 26.4% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 56 | 127 |
| 5.9% | 4.8% | 4.1% | |
| Not very useful | 1 | 61 | 151 |
| 5.9% | 5.3% | 4.8% | |
| Moderately useful | 4 | 143 | 416 |
| 23.5% | 12.4% | 13.3% | |
| Very useful | 1 | 94 | 339 |
| 5.9% | 8.1% | 10.8% | |
| Extremely useful | 0 | 27 | 165 |
| 0.0% | 2.3% | 5.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1155 | 3129 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.4. Online services: Personalized dashboards that give you real-time feedback about students’ progress | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service not provided | 10 | 424 | 1205 |
| 58.8% | 36.5% | 38.4% | |
| Don’t know | 2 | 355 | 747 |
| 11.8% | 30.6% | 23.8% | |
| Not at all useful | 1 | 57 | 136 |
| 5.9% | 4.9% | 4.3% | |
| Not very useful | 0 | 76 | 179 |
| 0.0% | 6.5% | 5.7% | |
| Moderately useful | 4 | 144 | 398 |
| 23.5% | 12.4% | 12.7% | |
| Very useful | 0 | 81 | 316 |
| 0.0% | 7.0% | 10.1% | |
| Extremely useful | 0 | 24 | 156 |
| 0.0% | 2.1% | 5.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1161 | 3137 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Learning management system | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 3 | 187 | 511 |
| 5.5% | 4.4% | 4.5% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 297 | 688 |
| 0.0% | 7.0% | 6.1% | |
| Disagree | 4 | 393 | 945 |
| 7.3% | 9.3% | 8.3% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 1070 | 2682 |
| 25.5% | 25.2% | 23.7% | |
| Agree | 21 | 1695 | 4606 |
| 38.2% | 39.9% | 40.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 13 | 603 | 1900 |
| 23.6% | 14.2% | 16.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4245 | 11332 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Online collaboration tools | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 186 | 530 |
| 3.7% | 4.4% | 4.7% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 313 | 692 |
| 3.7% | 7.3% | 6.1% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 414 | 947 |
| 1.9% | 9.7% | 8.3% | |
| Neutral | 12 | 1057 | 2631 |
| 22.2% | 24.8% | 23.2% | |
| Agree | 26 | 1729 | 4795 |
| 48.1% | 40.6% | 42.3% | |
| Strongly agree | 11 | 561 | 1754 |
| 20.4% | 13.2% | 15.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4260 | 11349 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: E-portfolios | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 11 | 740 | 1703 |
| 21.6% | 17.5% | 15.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 5 | 527 | 1185 |
| 9.8% | 12.4% | 10.5% | |
| Disagree | 5 | 675 | 1662 |
| 9.8% | 15.9% | 14.7% | |
| Neutral | 18 | 1194 | 3416 |
| 35.3% | 28.2% | 30.2% | |
| Agree | 10 | 867 | 2588 |
| 19.6% | 20.5% | 22.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 235 | 746 |
| 3.9% | 5.5% | 6.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
51 | 4238 | 11300 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: E-books or e-textbooks | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 227 | 598 |
| 1.9% | 5.3% | 5.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 5 | 421 | 950 |
| 9.3% | 9.9% | 8.4% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 570 | 1370 |
| 16.7% | 13.4% | 12.1% | |
| Neutral | 15 | 1250 | 3132 |
| 27.8% | 29.4% | 27.6% | |
| Agree | 17 | 1450 | 4009 |
| 31.5% | 34.1% | 35.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 7 | 339 | 1274 |
| 13.0% | 8.0% | 11.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4257 | 11333 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Free, web-based content to supplement course-related materials | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 3 | 189 | 437 |
| 5.5% | 4.4% | 3.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 363 | 816 |
| 1.8% | 8.5% | 7.2% | |
| Disagree | 8 | 434 | 972 |
| 14.5% | 10.2% | 8.5% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 1028 | 2465 |
| 25.5% | 24.1% | 21.7% | |
| Agree | 16 | 1751 | 4946 |
| 29.1% | 41.1% | 43.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 13 | 499 | 1735 |
| 23.6% | 11.7% | 15.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4264 | 11371 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Simulations or educational games | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 3 | 240 | 669 |
| 5.5% | 5.7% | 5.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 477 | 1035 |
| 5.5% | 11.2% | 9.2% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 499 | 1173 |
| 16.4% | 11.7% | 10.4% | |
| Neutral | 13 | 933 | 2446 |
| 23.6% | 22.0% | 21.6% | |
| Agree | 15 | 1581 | 4414 |
| 27.3% | 37.2% | 39.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 12 | 517 | 1568 |
| 21.8% | 12.2% | 13.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4247 | 11305 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Lecture capture/classroom-based recordings | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 182 | 574 |
| 0.0% | 4.3% | 5.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 401 | 928 |
| 3.7% | 9.4% | 8.2% | |
| Disagree | 12 | 551 | 1266 |
| 22.2% | 12.9% | 11.2% | |
| Neutral | 13 | 995 | 2650 |
| 24.1% | 23.4% | 23.3% | |
| Agree | 19 | 1591 | 4292 |
| 35.2% | 37.3% | 37.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 8 | 541 | 1642 |
| 14.8% | 12.7% | 14.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4261 | 11352 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Students’ tablets during class | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 282 | 984 |
| 3.8% | 6.6% | 8.7% | |
| Strongly disagree | 8 | 643 | 1458 |
| 15.1% | 15.1% | 12.9% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 782 | 1848 |
| 17.0% | 18.4% | 16.3% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 1046 | 2834 |
| 26.4% | 24.6% | 25.0% | |
| Agree | 17 | 1229 | 3359 |
| 32.1% | 28.9% | 29.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 266 | 850 |
| 5.7% | 6.3% | 7.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
53 | 4248 | 11333 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Students’ smartphones during class | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 237 | 859 |
| 3.8% | 5.6% | 7.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 10 | 1010 | 2307 |
| 18.9% | 23.8% | 20.4% | |
| Disagree | 11 | 867 | 2161 |
| 20.8% | 20.4% | 19.1% | |
| Neutral | 16 | 873 | 2427 |
| 30.2% | 20.5% | 21.4% | |
| Agree | 11 | 1020 | 2803 |
| 20.8% | 24.0% | 24.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 244 | 773 |
| 5.7% | 5.7% | 6.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
53 | 4251 | 11330 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Students’ laptops during class | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 215 | 827 |
| 3.7% | 5.1% | 7.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 9 | 602 | 1353 |
| 16.7% | 14.2% | 11.9% | |
| Disagree | 7 | 642 | 1594 |
| 13.0% | 15.1% | 14.1% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 1047 | 2857 |
| 25.9% | 24.6% | 25.2% | |
| Agree | 19 | 1421 | 3682 |
| 35.2% | 33.4% | 32.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 325 | 1011 |
| 5.6% | 7.6% | 8.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4252 | 11324 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Social media as a teaching and learning tool | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 206 | 560 |
| 3.6% | 4.8% | 4.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 10 | 783 | 1833 |
| 18.2% | 18.4% | 16.2% | |
| Disagree | 12 | 822 | 1994 |
| 21.8% | 19.3% | 17.6% | |
| Neutral | 15 | 1106 | 3017 |
| 27.3% | 26.0% | 26.6% | |
| Agree | 11 | 1071 | 3095 |
| 20.0% | 25.2% | 27.3% | |
| Strongly agree | 5 | 266 | 848 |
| 9.1% | 6.3% | 7.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4254 | 11347 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: 3D printers | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 3 | 252 | 715 |
| 17.6% | 21.7% | 22.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 269 | 604 |
| 17.6% | 23.1% | 19.2% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 190 | 492 |
| 5.9% | 16.3% | 15.7% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 245 | 723 |
| 23.5% | 21.1% | 23.0% | |
| Agree | 4 | 145 | 415 |
| 23.5% | 12.5% | 13.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 62 | 193 |
| 11.8% | 5.3% | 6.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1163 | 3142 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Nonkeyboard or nonmouse computer interfaces | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 133 | 364 |
| 11.8% | 11.4% | 11.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 149 | 368 |
| 11.8% | 12.8% | 11.7% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 208 | 484 |
| 11.8% | 17.9% | 15.4% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 351 | 940 |
| 35.3% | 30.2% | 29.9% | |
| Agree | 1 | 249 | 744 |
| 5.9% | 21.4% | 23.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 4 | 72 | 247 |
| 23.5% | 6.2% | 7.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1162 | 3147 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Software to create videos or multimedia resources | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 67 | 169 |
| 0.0% | 5.8% | 5.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 95 | 207 |
| 11.8% | 8.2% | 6.6% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 109 | 271 |
| 0.0% | 9.4% | 8.6% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 219 | 576 |
| 17.6% | 18.9% | 18.4% | |
| Agree | 9 | 439 | 1258 |
| 52.9% | 37.8% | 40.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 231 | 657 |
| 17.6% | 19.9% | 20.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1160 | 3138 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Early-alert systems designed to catch potential academic trouble … | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 61 | 171 |
| 0.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 128 | 280 |
| 5.9% | 11.0% | 8.9% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 169 | 379 |
| 0.0% | 14.6% | 12.1% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 294 | 714 |
| 17.6% | 25.3% | 22.7% | |
| Agree | 8 | 388 | 1167 |
| 47.1% | 33.4% | 37.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 5 | 120 | 429 |
| 29.4% | 10.3% | 13.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1160 | 3140 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Search tools to find references or other information online for class work | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 60 | 167 |
| 0.0% | 5.2% | 5.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 122 | 268 |
| 5.9% | 10.5% | 8.5% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 150 | 346 |
| 17.6% | 12.9% | 11.0% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 277 | 707 |
| 23.5% | 23.8% | 22.5% | |
| Agree | 3 | 412 | 1182 |
| 17.6% | 35.4% | 37.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 6 | 144 | 474 |
| 35.3% | 12.4% | 15.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1165 | 3144 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 3.5. More effective if better skilled: Blogs or online discussion/collaboration tools related to class work | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 58 | 161 |
| 5.9% | 5.0% | 5.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 118 | 290 |
| 5.9% | 10.2% | 9.3% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 171 | 426 |
| 11.8% | 14.8% | 13.6% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 318 | 852 |
| 23.5% | 27.6% | 27.2% | |
| Agree | 5 | 385 | 1090 |
| 29.4% | 33.4% | 34.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 4 | 104 | 310 |
| 23.5% | 9.0% | 9.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1154 | 3129 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
For question 3.7a, respondents ranked up to three items.
The values reported here are the number and percentage of respondents ranking each item.
| 3.7a. Motivation for integration | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| More/better technology-oriented professional development opportunities | 8 | 639 | 2139 |
| 13.8% | 13.5% | 17.7% | |
| A monetary or other value-oriented incentive | 9 | 625 | 2057 |
| 15.5% | 13.2% | 17.0% | |
| Tenure decisions and other professional advancement considerations | 7 | 405 | 953 |
| 12.1% | 8.5% | 7.9% | |
| Release time to design/redesign my courses | 13 | 1442 | 3628 |
| 22.4% | 30.4% | 30.1% | |
| Direct assistance from an instructional design expert to design/redesign my courses | 13 | 1141 | 2811 |
| 22.4% | 24.1% | 23.3% | |
| Direct assistance from IT staff to support the technology I choose to implement | 14 | 1149 | 2906 |
| 24.1% | 24.2% | 24.1% | |
| A teaching assistant to assist with technology implementation | 12 | 785 | 1590 |
| 20.7% | 16.6% | 13.2% | |
| Support/encouragement from peers | 1 | 138 | 370 |
| 1.7% | 2.9% | 3.1% | |
| Working in a faculty cohort or community that is adopting the same types of practices | 15 | 707 | 1951 |
| 25.9% | 14.9% | 16.2% | |
| A better understanding of the types of technologies relevant to teaching and learning | 12 | 1200 | 3370 |
| 20.7% | 25.3% | 27.9% | |
| Confidence that the technology would work the way I planned | 15 | 1337 | 3609 |
| 25.9% | 28.2% | 29.9% | |
| Increased student expectations of technology integration | 4 | 298 | 980 |
| 6.9% | 6.3% | 8.1% | |
| Clear indication/evidence that students would benefit | 25 | 1924 | 5026 |
| 43.1% | 40.6% | 41.6% | |
| Other; please specify | 1 | 148 | 425 |
| 1.7% | 3.1% | 3.5% | |
| Total respondent count | 58 | 4741 | 12070 |
| 4.1. Course sections in a typical year | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | 18 | 1023 | 1878 |
| 33.3% | 24.6% | 16.8% | |
| 3–5 | 24 | 2028 | 4058 |
| 44.4% | 48.8% | 36.2% | |
| 6–9 | 8 | 858 | 3375 |
| 14.8% | 20.7% | 30.1% | |
| 10+ | 4 | 244 | 1889 |
| 7.4% | 5.9% | 16.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4153 | 11200 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.2. In how many of your courses did you use a blended approach to teaching? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 36 | 76 |
| 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.7% | |
| None | 20 | 1946 | 4972 |
| 37.0% | 45.9% | 43.8% | |
| A few | 13 | 906 | 2512 |
| 24.1% | 21.4% | 22.1% | |
| About half | 6 | 455 | 1198 |
| 11.1% | 10.7% | 10.6% | |
| Nearly all | 8 | 461 | 1323 |
| 14.8% | 10.9% | 11.7% | |
| All | 7 | 434 | 1269 |
| 13.0% | 10.2% | 11.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4238 | 11350 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.2. In how many of your courses did you use a completely online learning environment? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 24 | 45 |
| 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.4% | |
| None | 43 | 3163 | 7411 |
| 78.2% | 74.7% | 65.4% | |
| A few | 7 | 498 | 1574 |
| 12.7% | 11.8% | 13.9% | |
| About half | 1 | 248 | 747 |
| 1.8% | 5.9% | 6.6% | |
| Nearly all | 2 | 113 | 438 |
| 3.6% | 2.7% | 3.9% | |
| All | 2 | 189 | 1121 |
| 3.6% | 4.5% | 9.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4235 | 11336 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.2. In how many of your courses did you use a “flipped” pedagogical model? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 205 | 558 |
| 3.7% | 4.9% | 5.0% | |
| None | 24 | 2714 | 7102 |
| 44.4% | 64.6% | 63.3% | |
| A few | 13 | 668 | 1888 |
| 24.1% | 15.9% | 16.8% | |
| About half | 6 | 305 | 751 |
| 11.1% | 7.3% | 6.7% | |
| Nearly all | 8 | 171 | 539 |
| 14.8% | 4.1% | 4.8% | |
| All | 1 | 140 | 389 |
| 1.9% | 3.3% | 3.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4203 | 11227 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.4a. Have you taught a MOOC in the past year? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don’t know what a MOOC is | 2 | 99 | 404 |
| 20.0% | 13.9% | 19.0% | |
| No, but I do know what a MOOC is | 8 | 596 | 1680 |
| 80.0% | 83.7% | 78.9% | |
| Yes | 0 | 17 | 46 |
| 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 712 | 2130 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.4b. Through whom did you teach a MOOC? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Through the institution that asked me to take this survey | 0 | 13 | 25 |
| 0 | 76.5% | 56.8% | |
| Through another institution | 0 | 2 | 16 |
| 0 | 11.8% | 36.4% | |
| Through a MOOC provider like Coursera or Udacity | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| 0 | 35.3% | 22.7% | |
| Total respondent count | 0 | 17 | 44 |
| 4.5a. Have you taken a MOOC in the past year? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No, and I don't know what a MOOC is | 4 | 172 | 619 |
| 23.5% | 14.7% | 19.5% | |
| No, but I do know what a MOOC is | 10 | 846 | 2092 |
| 58.8% | 72.2% | 65.9% | |
| Yes | 3 | 153 | 462 |
| 17.6% | 13.1% | 14.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1171 | 3173 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.5b. Through whom did you take a MOOC? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Through the institution that asked me to take this survey | 0 | 7 | 27 |
| 0.0% | 4.6% | 5.9% | |
| Through another institution | 2 | 65 | 192 |
| 66.7% | 42.5% | 41.6% | |
| Through a MOOC provider like Coursera or Udacity | 1 | 100 | 290 |
| 33.3% | 65.4% | 62.9% | |
| Total respondent count | 3 | 153 | 461 |
| 4.6. Have you earned a digital badge or other type of digital credential? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 62 | 241 |
| 11.8% | 5.3% | 7.6% | |
| No | 12 | 942 | 2435 |
| 70.6% | 80.7% | 77.0% | |
| Yes | 3 | 164 | 487 |
| 17.6% | 14.0% | 15.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1168 | 3163 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.7. Opinion of: MOOCs | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 17 | 1135 | 3389 |
| 30.9% | 26.6% | 29.8% | |
| Completely opposed | 3 | 391 | 948 |
| 5.5% | 9.2% | 8.3% | |
| Generally opposed, but willing to consider | 7 | 770 | 1756 |
| 12.7% | 18.1% | 15.4% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 811 | 2287 |
| 25.5% | 19.0% | 20.1% | |
| Generally supportive, but somewhat skeptical | 13 | 884 | 2138 |
| 23.6% | 20.8% | 18.8% | |
| Completely supportive | 1 | 268 | 855 |
| 1.8% | 6.3% | 7.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4259 | 11373 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.7. Opinion of: Competency-based education | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 13 | 1303 | 2903 |
| 23.6% | 30.6% | 25.5% | |
| Completely opposed | 2 | 150 | 379 |
| 3.6% | 3.5% | 3.3% | |
| Generally opposed, but willing to consider | 1 | 287 | 761 |
| 1.8% | 6.7% | 6.7% | |
| Neutral | 8 | 749 | 2019 |
| 14.5% | 17.6% | 17.7% | |
| Generally supportive, but somewhat skeptical | 18 | 955 | 2778 |
| 32.7% | 22.4% | 24.4% | |
| Completely supportive | 13 | 815 | 2541 |
| 23.6% | 19.1% | 22.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4259 | 11381 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.7. Opinion of: Badges or digital credentials | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 23 | 1859 | 4626 |
| 41.8% | 43.6% | 40.7% | |
| Completely opposed | 4 | 268 | 601 |
| 7.3% | 6.3% | 5.3% | |
| Generally opposed, but willing to consider | 3 | 393 | 962 |
| 5.5% | 9.2% | 8.5% | |
| Neutral | 11 | 932 | 2667 |
| 20.0% | 21.9% | 23.4% | |
| Generally supportive, but somewhat skeptical | 12 | 561 | 1644 |
| 21.8% | 13.2% | 14.5% | |
| Completely supportive | 2 | 248 | 877 |
| 3.6% | 5.8% | 7.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4261 | 11377 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.7. Opinion of: Gamification | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 17 | 1715 | 4527 |
| 30.9% | 40.3% | 39.8% | |
| Completely opposed | 4 | 324 | 749 |
| 7.3% | 7.6% | 6.6% | |
| Generally opposed, but willing to consider | 3 | 506 | 1241 |
| 5.5% | 11.9% | 10.9% | |
| Neutral | 19 | 764 | 2171 |
| 34.5% | 18.0% | 19.1% | |
| Generally supportive, but somewhat skeptical | 9 | 634 | 1723 |
| 16.4% | 14.9% | 15.2% | |
| Completely supportive | 3 | 313 | 956 |
| 5.5% | 7.4% | 8.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4256 | 11367 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.7. Opinion of: Open educational resources | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 14 | 1463 | 3516 |
| 25.5% | 34.4% | 30.9% | |
| Completely opposed | 1 | 81 | 184 |
| 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.6% | |
| Generally opposed, but willing to consider | 0 | 209 | 496 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 4.4% | |
| Neutral | 7 | 761 | 2080 |
| 12.7% | 17.9% | 18.3% | |
| Generally supportive, but somewhat skeptical | 17 | 942 | 2572 |
| 30.9% | 22.1% | 22.6% | |
| Completely supportive | 16 | 799 | 2524 |
| 29.1% | 18.8% | 22.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4255 | 11372 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Availability of classrooms with multimedia equipment | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 2 | 188 | 917 |
| 3.7% | 4.4% | 8.0% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 10 | 293 | 692 |
| 18.5% | 6.8% | 6.0% | |
| Dissatisfied | 6 | 668 | 1470 |
| 11.1% | 15.6% | 12.8% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 594 | 1473 |
| 9.3% | 13.9% | 12.9% | |
| Satisfied | 25 | 1889 | 4873 |
| 46.3% | 44.1% | 42.6% | |
| Very satisfied | 6 | 650 | 2015 |
| 11.1% | 15.2% | 17.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4282 | 11440 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Reliability of equipment available | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 131 | 697 |
| 0.0% | 3.1% | 6.1% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 7 | 297 | 777 |
| 12.7% | 6.9% | 6.8% | |
| Dissatisfied | 7 | 764 | 1834 |
| 12.7% | 17.9% | 16.0% | |
| Neutral | 11 | 763 | 1941 |
| 20.0% | 17.8% | 17.0% | |
| Satisfied | 24 | 1869 | 4898 |
| 43.6% | 43.7% | 42.8% | |
| Very satisfied | 6 | 455 | 1285 |
| 10.9% | 10.6% | 11.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4279 | 11432 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Refresh/update frequency of equipment | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 86 | 294 |
| 0.0% | 7.4% | 9.3% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 4 | 150 | 389 |
| 23.5% | 12.9% | 12.3% | |
| Dissatisfied | 6 | 246 | 600 |
| 35.3% | 21.1% | 19.0% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 283 | 754 |
| 23.5% | 24.3% | 23.9% | |
| Satisfied | 2 | 333 | 901 |
| 11.8% | 28.6% | 28.6% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 68 | 215 |
| 5.9% | 5.8% | 6.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1166 | 3153 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Refresh/update frequency of software | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 129 | 346 |
| 0.0% | 11.1% | 11.0% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 99 | 280 |
| 5.9% | 8.5% | 8.9% | |
| Dissatisfied | 5 | 184 | 509 |
| 29.4% | 15.8% | 16.1% | |
| Neutral | 7 | 319 | 767 |
| 41.2% | 27.3% | 24.3% | |
| Satisfied | 4 | 356 | 996 |
| 23.5% | 30.5% | 31.5% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 80 | 261 |
| 0.0% | 6.9% | 8.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1167 | 3159 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Technology that supports open learning classrooms | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 5 | 454 | 1279 |
| 29.4% | 39.2% | 40.7% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 118 | 279 |
| 5.9% | 10.2% | 8.9% | |
| Dissatisfied | 5 | 196 | 471 |
| 29.4% | 16.9% | 15.0% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 228 | 601 |
| 23.5% | 19.7% | 19.1% | |
| Satisfied | 2 | 124 | 389 |
| 11.8% | 10.7% | 12.4% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 37 | 125 |
| 0.0% | 3.2% | 4.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1157 | 3144 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Variety of equipment available | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 76 | 278 |
| 5.9% | 6.5% | 8.8% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 103 | 249 |
| 5.9% | 8.8% | 7.9% | |
| Dissatisfied | 5 | 187 | 494 |
| 29.4% | 16.1% | 15.7% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 299 | 771 |
| 29.4% | 25.7% | 24.5% | |
| Satisfied | 5 | 417 | 1097 |
| 29.4% | 35.8% | 34.8% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 83 | 264 |
| 0.0% | 7.1% | 8.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1165 | 3153 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Variety of software | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 111 | 313 |
| 5.9% | 9.5% | 9.9% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 98 | 234 |
| 5.9% | 8.4% | 7.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 3 | 154 | 434 |
| 17.6% | 13.2% | 13.8% | |
| Neutral | 9 | 315 | 825 |
| 52.9% | 27.1% | 26.1% | |
| Satisfied | 3 | 418 | 1098 |
| 17.6% | 35.9% | 34.8% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 68 | 251 |
| 0.0% | 5.8% | 8.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1164 | 3155 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: General ease-of-use of podium systems | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 6 | 282 | 1372 |
| 11.1% | 6.6% | 12.0% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 7 | 237 | 588 |
| 13.0% | 5.5% | 5.1% | |
| Dissatisfied | 8 | 550 | 1361 |
| 14.8% | 12.9% | 11.9% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 742 | 1887 |
| 9.3% | 17.4% | 16.5% | |
| Satisfied | 21 | 1908 | 4684 |
| 38.9% | 44.6% | 41.0% | |
| Very satisfied | 7 | 557 | 1535 |
| 13.0% | 13.0% | 13.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4276 | 11427 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Computers in the podiums | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 144 | 543 |
| 5.9% | 12.4% | 17.2% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 99 | 242 |
| 5.9% | 8.5% | 7.7% | |
| Dissatisfied | 5 | 167 | 395 |
| 29.4% | 14.4% | 12.5% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 223 | 512 |
| 29.4% | 19.2% | 16.2% | |
| Satisfied | 4 | 421 | 1088 |
| 23.5% | 36.2% | 34.5% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 108 | 375 |
| 5.9% | 9.3% | 11.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1162 | 3155 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Software on the podium computers | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 3 | 156 | 555 |
| 17.6% | 13.4% | 17.6% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 96 | 233 |
| 5.9% | 8.3% | 7.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 4 | 164 | 387 |
| 23.5% | 14.1% | 12.3% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 256 | 628 |
| 23.5% | 22.0% | 19.9% | |
| Satisfied | 4 | 402 | 1059 |
| 23.5% | 34.6% | 33.6% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 88 | 290 |
| 5.9% | 7.6% | 9.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1162 | 3152 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Computer projection | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 40 | 230 |
| 0.0% | 3.4% | 7.3% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 2 | 84 | 208 |
| 11.8% | 7.2% | 6.6% | |
| Dissatisfied | 2 | 164 | 377 |
| 11.8% | 14.1% | 11.9% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 202 | 453 |
| 23.5% | 17.3% | 14.4% | |
| Satisfied | 6 | 522 | 1394 |
| 35.3% | 44.8% | 44.2% | |
| Very satisfied | 3 | 153 | 494 |
| 17.6% | 13.1% | 15.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1165 | 3156 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Audience response systems | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 5 | 531 | 1500 |
| 29.4% | 45.7% | 47.5% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 90 | 217 |
| 0.0% | 7.7% | 6.9% | |
| Dissatisfied | 4 | 121 | 341 |
| 23.5% | 10.4% | 10.8% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 230 | 608 |
| 23.5% | 19.8% | 19.3% | |
| Satisfied | 3 | 147 | 359 |
| 17.6% | 12.7% | 11.4% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 43 | 130 |
| 5.9% | 3.7% | 4.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1162 | 3155 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Wireless access | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 48 | 216 |
| 0.0% | 4.1% | 6.8% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 104 | 261 |
| 5.9% | 8.9% | 8.3% | |
| Dissatisfied | 1 | 177 | 466 |
| 5.9% | 15.2% | 14.8% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 181 | 450 |
| 17.6% | 15.5% | 14.3% | |
| Satisfied | 6 | 463 | 1209 |
| 35.3% | 39.7% | 38.3% | |
| Very satisfied | 6 | 193 | 555 |
| 35.3% | 16.6% | 17.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1166 | 3157 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.8. Classroom technologies: Overall satisfaction | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 92 | 549 |
| 0.0% | 2.2% | 4.8% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 7 | 197 | 508 |
| 12.7% | 4.6% | 4.5% | |
| Dissatisfied | 6 | 567 | 1347 |
| 10.9% | 13.3% | 11.8% | |
| Neutral | 9 | 923 | 2273 |
| 16.4% | 21.6% | 19.9% | |
| Satisfied | 28 | 2050 | 5385 |
| 50.9% | 48.1% | 47.2% | |
| Very satisfied | 5 | 436 | 1343 |
| 9.1% | 10.2% | 11.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4265 | 11405 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9a. LMS usage | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| I don’t use the LMS at all | 0 | 734 | 1702 |
| 0.0% | 17.1% | 14.9% | |
| To push out information | 41 | 2823 | 6998 |
| 74.5% | 65.9% | 61.1% | |
| To promote interaction outside the classroom | 35 | 1743 | 5042 |
| 63.6% | 40.7% | 44.0% | |
| To teach partially online courses or programs | 10 | 674 | 2379 |
| 18.2% | 15.7% | 20.8% | |
| To teach completely online courses or programs | 10 | 863 | 3196 |
| 18.2% | 20.1% | 27.9% | |
| Total respondent count | 55 | 4284 | 11459 |
| 4.9b. How often do you typically use the LMS? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 26 | 1832 | 5706 |
| 47.3% | 51.6% | 58.5% | |
| Weekly | 27 | 1509 | 3518 |
| 49.1% | 42.5% | 36.1% | |
| Monthly | 1 | 139 | 327 |
| 1.8% | 3.9% | 3.4% | |
| Less than monthly | 1 | 69 | 195 |
| 1.8% | 1.9% | 2.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 3549 | 9746 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9c. What LMS do you typically use? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackboard | 55 | 1434 | 3632 |
| 100.0% | 40.4% | 37.3% | |
| D2L | 0 | 577 | 1169 |
| 0.0% | 16.3% | 12.0% | |
| Canvas | 0 | 588 | 1759 |
| 0.0% | 16.6% | 18.1% | |
| Jenzabar e-Racer | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | |
| Moodle (Moodle Trust) | 0 | 192 | 663 |
| 0.0% | 5.4% | 6.8% | |
| Moodlerooms Joule | 0 | 1 | 42 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | |
| Pearson eCollege | 0 | 11 | 175 |
| 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.8% | |
| Sakai | 0 | 102 | 317 |
| 0.0% | 2.9% | 3.3% | |
| Homegrown/locally developed | 0 | 108 | 273 |
| 0.0% | 3.0% | 2.8% | |
| Other product; please specify | 0 | 511 | 1601 |
| 0.0% | 14.4% | 16.4% | |
| Don’t know | 0 | 24 | 104 |
| 0.0% | 0.7% | 1.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 3549 | 9743 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Ease of use in general | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 29 | 60 |
| 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.6% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 251 | 523 |
| 0.0% | 7.1% | 5.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 10 | 700 | 1430 |
| 18.2% | 19.8% | 14.7% | |
| Neutral | 11 | 748 | 1803 |
| 20.0% | 21.1% | 18.6% | |
| Satisfied | 30 | 1601 | 4839 |
| 54.5% | 45.2% | 49.9% | |
| Very satisfied | 4 | 210 | 1051 |
| 7.3% | 5.9% | 10.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 3539 | 9706 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Ease of use from a mobile device | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 15 | 1309 | 3041 |
| 27.8% | 37.1% | 31.4% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 8 | 450 | 1155 |
| 14.8% | 12.7% | 11.9% | |
| Dissatisfied | 14 | 679 | 1816 |
| 25.9% | 19.2% | 18.7% | |
| Neutral | 12 | 679 | 2054 |
| 22.2% | 19.2% | 21.2% | |
| Satisfied | 5 | 355 | 1337 |
| 9.3% | 10.1% | 13.8% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 59 | 292 |
| 0.0% | 1.7% | 3.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 3531 | 9695 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Engaging in meaningful interactions with students | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 6 | 726 | 1531 |
| 10.9% | 20.5% | 15.8% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 200 | 434 |
| 1.8% | 5.7% | 4.5% | |
| Dissatisfied | 3 | 512 | 1176 |
| 5.5% | 14.5% | 12.1% | |
| Neutral | 19 | 1046 | 2589 |
| 34.5% | 29.6% | 26.7% | |
| Satisfied | 25 | 922 | 3245 |
| 45.5% | 26.1% | 33.4% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 129 | 730 |
| 1.8% | 3.6% | 7.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 3535 | 9705 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: System availability | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 19 | 36 |
| 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.3% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 34 | 65 |
| 0.0% | 3.4% | 2.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 0 | 81 | 159 |
| 0.0% | 8.1% | 5.8% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 205 | 460 |
| 23.5% | 20.4% | 16.7% | |
| Satisfied | 9 | 522 | 1517 |
| 52.9% | 52.0% | 55.0% | |
| Very satisfied | 4 | 142 | 522 |
| 23.5% | 14.2% | 18.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1003 | 2759 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: System response time | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 21 | 63 |
| 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.3% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 2 | 77 | 151 |
| 11.8% | 7.7% | 5.5% | |
| Dissatisfied | 2 | 152 | 330 |
| 11.8% | 15.2% | 12.0% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 228 | 581 |
| 35.3% | 22.8% | 21.0% | |
| Satisfied | 6 | 448 | 1298 |
| 35.3% | 44.7% | 47.0% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 76 | 338 |
| 5.9% | 7.6% | 12.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1002 | 2761 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Initial use training | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 5 | 126 | 260 |
| 29.4% | 12.6% | 9.4% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 116 | 240 |
| 0.0% | 11.6% | 8.7% | |
| Dissatisfied | 4 | 214 | 456 |
| 23.5% | 21.4% | 16.5% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 253 | 633 |
| 17.6% | 25.2% | 23.0% | |
| Satisfied | 5 | 247 | 920 |
| 29.4% | 24.7% | 33.4% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 46 | 249 |
| 0.0% | 4.6% | 9.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1002 | 2758 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Ongoing training/professional development | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 3 | 186 | 381 |
| 17.6% | 18.6% | 13.8% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 95 | 205 |
| 5.9% | 9.5% | 7.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 3 | 197 | 424 |
| 17.6% | 19.7% | 15.4% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 280 | 775 |
| 29.4% | 28.0% | 28.1% | |
| Satisfied | 5 | 213 | 779 |
| 29.4% | 21.3% | 28.2% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 30 | 196 |
| 0.0% | 3.0% | 7.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1001 | 2760 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Posting content | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 7 | 25 |
| 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 39 | 93 |
| 0.0% | 3.9% | 3.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 2 | 101 | 217 |
| 12.5% | 10.1% | 7.8% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 152 | 339 |
| 6.3% | 15.1% | 12.3% | |
| Satisfied | 9 | 538 | 1478 |
| 56.3% | 53.6% | 53.5% | |
| Very satisfied | 4 | 167 | 613 |
| 25.0% | 16.6% | 22.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
16 | 1004 | 2765 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Managing assignments | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 100 | 207 |
| 5.9% | 10.0% | 7.5% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 49 | 122 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 4.4% | |
| Dissatisfied | 2 | 130 | 306 |
| 11.8% | 13.0% | 11.1% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 227 | 521 |
| 23.5% | 22.7% | 18.9% | |
| Satisfied | 8 | 409 | 1242 |
| 47.1% | 40.9% | 45.0% | |
| Very satisfied | 2 | 86 | 362 |
| 11.8% | 8.6% | 13.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1001 | 2760 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Monitoring or managing enrollments | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 5 | 127 | 352 |
| 29.4% | 12.7% | 12.8% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 46 | 110 |
| 0.0% | 4.6% | 4.0% | |
| Dissatisfied | 1 | 99 | 277 |
| 5.9% | 9.9% | 10.0% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 228 | 583 |
| 29.4% | 22.7% | 21.1% | |
| Satisfied | 5 | 430 | 1151 |
| 29.4% | 42.9% | 41.7% | |
| Very satisfied | 1 | 73 | 287 |
| 5.9% | 7.3% | 10.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1003 | 2760 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Entering student progress information | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 84 | 171 |
| 5.9% | 8.4% | 6.2% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 83 | 196 |
| 0.0% | 8.3% | 7.1% | |
| Dissatisfied | 3 | 167 | 402 |
| 17.6% | 16.6% | 14.5% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 186 | 440 |
| 11.8% | 18.5% | 15.9% | |
| Satisfied | 11 | 391 | 1183 |
| 64.7% | 38.9% | 42.7% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 94 | 378 |
| 0.0% | 9.4% | 13.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1005 | 2770 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Receiving course assignments reliably | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 1 | 131 | 260 |
| 5.9% | 13.0% | 9.4% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 22 | 60 |
| 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.2% | |
| Dissatisfied | 2 | 78 | 173 |
| 11.8% | 7.8% | 6.3% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 174 | 412 |
| 23.5% | 17.3% | 14.9% | |
| Satisfied | 7 | 476 | 1370 |
| 41.2% | 47.4% | 49.6% | |
| Very satisfied | 3 | 123 | 485 |
| 17.6% | 12.3% | 17.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1004 | 2760 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Integrating third-party content | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 5 | 334 | 790 |
| 29.4% | 33.4% | 28.6% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 88 | 222 |
| 0.0% | 8.8% | 8.0% | |
| Dissatisfied | 1 | 165 | 407 |
| 5.9% | 16.5% | 14.8% | |
| Neutral | 9 | 231 | 651 |
| 52.9% | 23.1% | 23.6% | |
| Satisfied | 2 | 157 | 563 |
| 11.8% | 15.7% | 20.4% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 26 | 125 |
| 0.0% | 2.6% | 4.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1001 | 2758 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Integration with other institutional systems | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 4 | 164 | 420 |
| 23.5% | 16.4% | 15.2% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 1 | 114 | 274 |
| 5.9% | 11.4% | 9.9% | |
| Dissatisfied | 1 | 173 | 455 |
| 5.9% | 17.2% | 16.5% | |
| Neutral | 4 | 221 | 606 |
| 23.5% | 22.0% | 21.9% | |
| Satisfied | 7 | 281 | 799 |
| 41.2% | 28.0% | 28.9% | |
| Very satisfied | 0 | 50 | 208 |
| 0.0% | 5.0% | 7.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
17 | 1003 | 2762 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9. LMS satisfaction: Overall satisfaction | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | 0 | 28 | 52 |
| 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.5% | |
| Very dissatisfied | 0 | 193 | 403 |
| 0.0% | 5.5% | 4.2% | |
| Dissatisfied | 5 | 556 | 1170 |
| 9.1% | 15.8% | 12.1% | |
| Neutral | 16 | 1029 | 2383 |
| 29.1% | 29.2% | 24.6% | |
| Satisfied | 32 | 1559 | 4903 |
| 58.2% | 44.3% | 50.6% | |
| Very satisfied | 2 | 158 | 774 |
| 3.6% | 4.5% | 8.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 3523 | 9685 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9e. The LMS is critical to my teaching. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 36 | 109 |
| 1.9% | 1.0% | 1.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 7 | 234 | 563 |
| 13.0% | 6.6% | 5.8% | |
| Disagree | 7 | 515 | 1191 |
| 13.0% | 14.6% | 12.3% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 703 | 1790 |
| 11.1% | 19.9% | 18.4% | |
| Agree | 16 | 1280 | 3372 |
| 29.6% | 36.2% | 34.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 17 | 766 | 2677 |
| 31.5% | 21.7% | 27.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 3534 | 9702 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9e. The LMS is very useful as a tool to enhance my teaching. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 39 | 117 |
| 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.2% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 127 | 288 |
| 3.6% | 3.6% | 3.0% | |
| Disagree | 4 | 293 | 624 |
| 7.3% | 8.3% | 6.4% | |
| Neutral | 10 | 681 | 1546 |
| 18.2% | 19.3% | 15.9% | |
| Agree | 23 | 1733 | 4649 |
| 41.8% | 49.0% | 47.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 16 | 664 | 2481 |
| 29.1% | 18.8% | 25.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 3537 | 9705 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.9e. The LMS is very useful as a tool to enhance student learning. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 64 | 167 |
| 0.0% | 1.8% | 1.7% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 125 | 270 |
| 3.7% | 3.5% | 2.8% | |
| Disagree | 2 | 297 | 618 |
| 3.7% | 8.4% | 6.4% | |
| Neutral | 11 | 821 | 1851 |
| 20.4% | 23.2% | 19.1% | |
| Agree | 24 | 1635 | 4488 |
| 44.4% | 46.3% | 46.3% | |
| Strongly agree | 15 | 593 | 2307 |
| 27.8% | 16.8% | 23.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 3535 | 9701 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.10. In-class mobile device policy: Smartphone | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ban students from using it in class | 12 | 948 | 2510 |
| 21.8% | 22.3% | 22.2% | |
| Discourage students from using it in class | 13 | 1251 | 3073 |
| 23.6% | 29.5% | 27.2% | |
| Neither discourage nor encourage its use | 26 | 1590 | 4000 |
| 47.3% | 37.4% | 35.4% | |
| Encourage students to use it in class | 4 | 406 | 1551 |
| 7.3% | 9.6% | 13.7% | |
| Require students to use it in class | 0 | 51 | 161 |
| 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4246 | 11295 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.10. In-class mobile device policy: Tablet | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ban students from using it in class | 6 | 365 | 972 |
| 10.9% | 8.6% | 8.6% | |
| Discourage students from using it in class | 7 | 483 | 1169 |
| 12.7% | 11.4% | 10.4% | |
| Neither discourage nor encourage its use | 37 | 2297 | 5697 |
| 67.3% | 54.1% | 50.5% | |
| Encourage students to use it in class | 5 | 1013 | 3151 |
| 9.1% | 23.8% | 27.9% | |
| Require students to use it in class | 0 | 91 | 300 |
| 0.0% | 2.1% | 2.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4249 | 11289 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.10. In-class mobile device policy: Laptop | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ban students from using it in class | 4 | 314 | 807 |
| 7.3% | 7.4% | 7.1% | |
| Discourage students from using it in class | 7 | 420 | 1047 |
| 12.7% | 9.9% | 9.3% | |
| Neither discourage nor encourage its use | 32 | 2081 | 5165 |
| 58.2% | 49.0% | 45.7% | |
| Encourage students to use it in class | 8 | 1186 | 3545 |
| 14.5% | 27.9% | 31.3% | |
| Require students to use it in class | 4 | 245 | 746 |
| 7.3% | 5.8% | 6.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4246 | 11310 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.10. In-class mobile device policy: Wearable technologies | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ban students from using it in class | 9 | 637 | 1702 |
| 16.4% | 15.1% | 15.2% | |
| Discourage students from using it in class | 5 | 603 | 1509 |
| 9.1% | 14.3% | 13.5% | |
| Neither discourage nor encourage its use | 39 | 2835 | 7392 |
| 70.9% | 67.4% | 66.0% | |
| Encourage students to use it in class | 2 | 124 | 565 |
| 3.6% | 2.9% | 5.0% | |
| Require students to use it in class | 0 | 8 | 37 |
| 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4207 | 11205 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.11. Use smartphone in class | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use to take notes | 4 | 107 | 333 |
| 23.5% | 9.4% | 10.8% | |
| Use to engage in nonclass activities | 9 | 674 | 1692 |
| 52.9% | 59.0% | 55.1% | |
| Use to make other connections with the learning material | 5 | 294 | 941 |
| 29.4% | 25.7% | 30.7% | |
| Use specialized software or Internet for directed activities | 2 | 129 | 425 |
| 11.8% | 11.3% | 13.8% | |
| Do not typically use | 6 | 355 | 915 |
| 35.3% | 31.1% | 29.8% | |
| Total respondent count | 17 | 1142 | 3070 |
| 4.11. Use tablet in class | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use to take notes | 6 | 547 | 1334 |
| 35.3% | 47.8% | 43.4% | |
| Use to engage in nonclass activities | 7 | 555 | 1246 |
| 41.2% | 48.5% | 40.5% | |
| Use to make other connections with the learning material | 7 | 501 | 1347 |
| 41.2% | 43.8% | 43.8% | |
| Use specialized software or Internet for directed activities | 4 | 238 | 717 |
| 23.5% | 20.8% | 23.3% | |
| Do not typically use | 6 | 262 | 785 |
| 35.3% | 22.9% | 25.5% | |
| Total respondent count | 17 | 1145 | 3076 |
| 4.11. Use laptop in class | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use to take notes | 9 | 726 | 1776 |
| 52.9% | 63.0% | 57.4% | |
| Use to engage in nonclass activities | 8 | 601 | 1370 |
| 47.1% | 52.2% | 44.3% | |
| Use to make other connections with the learning material | 7 | 600 | 1597 |
| 41.2% | 52.1% | 51.6% | |
| Use specialized software or Internet for directed activities | 4 | 338 | 1008 |
| 23.5% | 29.3% | 32.6% | |
| Do not typically use | 4 | 127 | 429 |
| 23.5% | 11.0% | 13.9% | |
| Total respondent count | 17 | 1152 | 3095 |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: The use of mobile devices in-class can enhance learning. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 193 | 527 |
| 3.6% | 4.5% | 4.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 330 | 820 |
| 5.5% | 7.8% | 7.2% | |
| Disagree | 6 | 502 | 1184 |
| 10.9% | 11.8% | 10.4% | |
| Neutral | 16 | 1266 | 3210 |
| 29.1% | 29.8% | 28.3% | |
| Agree | 25 | 1629 | 4474 |
| 45.5% | 38.3% | 39.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 3 | 335 | 1128 |
| 5.5% | 7.9% | 9.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4255 | 11343 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: In-class use of mobile devices is distracting for me. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 3 | 84 | 330 |
| 5.5% | 2.0% | 2.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 274 | 879 |
| 3.6% | 6.4% | 7.7% | |
| Disagree | 13 | 779 | 2204 |
| 23.6% | 18.3% | 19.4% | |
| Neutral | 18 | 945 | 2557 |
| 32.7% | 22.2% | 22.5% | |
| Agree | 11 | 1371 | 3403 |
| 20.0% | 32.2% | 30.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 8 | 805 | 1981 |
| 14.5% | 18.9% | 17.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4258 | 11354 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: In-class use of mobile devices is distracting for the students. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 122 | 402 |
| 3.6% | 2.9% | 3.5% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 130 | 490 |
| 0.0% | 3.1% | 4.3% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 457 | 1486 |
| 16.4% | 10.7% | 13.1% | |
| Neutral | 13 | 878 | 2431 |
| 23.6% | 20.6% | 21.4% | |
| Agree | 15 | 1599 | 3935 |
| 27.3% | 37.6% | 34.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 16 | 1068 | 2604 |
| 29.1% | 25.1% | 22.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4254 | 11348 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: I am concerned about the security/privacy problems of mobile technology. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 3 | 198 | 572 |
| 5.6% | 4.7% | 5.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 4 | 250 | 768 |
| 7.4% | 5.9% | 6.8% | |
| Disagree | 15 | 910 | 2388 |
| 27.8% | 21.4% | 21.0% | |
| Neutral | 14 | 1241 | 3258 |
| 25.9% | 29.1% | 28.7% | |
| Agree | 14 | 1255 | 3295 |
| 25.9% | 29.5% | 29.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 4 | 404 | 1068 |
| 7.4% | 9.5% | 9.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4258 | 11349 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: I’d like to have more training around effectively incorporating mobile devices into my courses. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 123 | 371 |
| 1.8% | 2.9% | 3.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 7 | 477 | 1104 |
| 12.7% | 11.2% | 9.7% | |
| Disagree | 13 | 727 | 1737 |
| 23.6% | 17.1% | 15.3% | |
| Neutral | 8 | 1026 | 2677 |
| 14.5% | 24.1% | 23.6% | |
| Agree | 19 | 1453 | 4082 |
| 34.5% | 34.2% | 36.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 7 | 446 | 1377 |
| 12.7% | 10.5% | 12.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4252 | 11348 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: I create assignments that take advantage of student access to mobile technologies. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 128 | 431 |
| 1.8% | 3.0% | 3.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 15 | 859 | 1903 |
| 27.3% | 20.2% | 16.8% | |
| Disagree | 21 | 1239 | 3092 |
| 38.2% | 29.2% | 27.3% | |
| Neutral | 6 | 886 | 2466 |
| 10.9% | 20.9% | 21.8% | |
| Agree | 11 | 889 | 2699 |
| 20.0% | 20.9% | 23.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 1 | 246 | 742 |
| 1.8% | 5.8% | 6.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
55 | 4247 | 11333 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 4.12. In-class mobile: My institution makes mobile learning a priority. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 14 | 987 | 2195 |
| 25.9% | 23.2% | 19.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 4 | 501 | 1461 |
| 7.4% | 11.8% | 12.9% | |
| Disagree | 22 | 1215 | 3087 |
| 40.7% | 28.6% | 27.2% | |
| Neutral | 13 | 1222 | 3302 |
| 24.1% | 28.7% | 29.1% | |
| Agree | 1 | 284 | 1030 |
| 1.9% | 6.7% | 9.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 42 | 256 |
| 0.0% | 1.0% | 2.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
54 | 4251 | 11331 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: I receive adequate and appropriate support from IT staff to conduct my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 81 | 244 |
| 2.8% | 2.6% | 4.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 308 | 622 |
| 8.3% | 10.0% | 10.2% | |
| Disagree | 8 | 428 | 825 |
| 22.2% | 14.0% | 13.6% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 665 | 1363 |
| 13.9% | 21.7% | 22.5% | |
| Agree | 14 | 1111 | 1946 |
| 38.9% | 36.2% | 32.1% | |
| Strongly agree | 1 | 253 | 467 |
| 2.8% | 8.3% | 7.7% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 4 | 219 | 602 |
| 11.1% | 7.1% | 9.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
36 | 3065 | 6069 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: I have access to IT staff with specialized knowledge about RC in support of my academic discipline. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 3 | 178 | 491 |
| 8.3% | 5.8% | 8.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 6 | 385 | 857 |
| 16.7% | 12.6% | 14.1% | |
| Disagree | 6 | 551 | 1095 |
| 16.7% | 18.0% | 18.1% | |
| Neutral | 8 | 546 | 1026 |
| 22.2% | 17.8% | 16.9% | |
| Agree | 8 | 885 | 1508 |
| 22.2% | 28.9% | 24.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 250 | 451 |
| 5.6% | 8.2% | 7.4% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 3 | 267 | 634 |
| 8.3% | 8.7% | 10.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
36 | 3062 | 6062 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: I have access to the specialized software/applications I need to conduct my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 88 | 249 |
| 5.6% | 2.9% | 4.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 227 | 523 |
| 5.6% | 7.4% | 8.6% | |
| Disagree | 5 | 396 | 847 |
| 13.9% | 12.9% | 14.0% | |
| Neutral | 8 | 500 | 1065 |
| 22.2% | 16.3% | 17.6% | |
| Agree | 15 | 1309 | 2294 |
| 41.7% | 42.7% | 37.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 312 | 531 |
| 5.6% | 10.2% | 8.8% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 2 | 230 | 558 |
| 5.6% | 7.5% | 9.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
36 | 3062 | 6067 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: I receive adequate support for federally funded IT and cyberinfrastructure resources. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 4 | 174 | 379 |
| 40.0% | 20.2% | 20.6% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 76 | 177 |
| 0.0% | 8.8% | 9.6% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 62 | 136 |
| 10.0% | 7.2% | 7.4% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 76 | 159 |
| 10.0% | 8.8% | 8.7% | |
| Agree | 0 | 49 | 80 |
| 0.0% | 5.7% | 4.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 8 | 14 |
| 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.8% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 4 | 418 | 891 |
| 40.0% | 48.4% | 48.5% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 863 | 1836 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: My institution makes electronic laboratory notebooks available to those whose projects require them. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 6 | 382 | 762 |
| 60.0% | 44.3% | 41.5% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 73 | 165 |
| 0.0% | 8.5% | 9.0% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 42 | 118 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 6.4% | |
| Neutral | 0 | 34 | 94 |
| 0.0% | 3.9% | 5.1% | |
| Agree | 1 | 15 | 53 |
| 10.0% | 1.7% | 2.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 7 | 18 |
| 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.0% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 3 | 309 | 627 |
| 30.0% | 35.8% | 34.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 862 | 1837 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: I receive timely support from IT staff to conduct my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 49 | 143 |
| 10.0% | 5.7% | 7.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 110 | 217 |
| 0.0% | 12.7% | 11.8% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 102 | 200 |
| 30.0% | 11.8% | 10.9% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 157 | 349 |
| 20.0% | 18.1% | 19.0% | |
| Agree | 2 | 268 | 493 |
| 20.0% | 30.9% | 26.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 75 | 143 |
| 0.0% | 8.7% | 7.8% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 2 | 106 | 293 |
| 20.0% | 12.2% | 15.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 867 | 1838 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: My institution ensures that faculty doing research are provided ongoing tech support …. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 2 | 196 | 406 |
| 20.0% | 22.7% | 22.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 138 | 304 |
| 10.0% | 16.0% | 16.6% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 135 | 305 |
| 10.0% | 15.6% | 16.6% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 128 | 288 |
| 30.0% | 14.8% | 15.7% | |
| Agree | 2 | 152 | 267 |
| 20.0% | 17.6% | 14.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 24 | 45 |
| 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.5% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 90 | 221 |
| 10.0% | 10.4% | 12.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 863 | 1836 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: My institution provides effective software to support grant applications and management. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 4 | 151 | 408 |
| 40.0% | 17.5% | 22.2% | |
| Strongly disagree | 3 | 113 | 258 |
| 30.0% | 13.1% | 14.1% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 122 | 251 |
| 10.0% | 14.2% | 13.7% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 155 | 288 |
| 10.0% | 18.0% | 15.7% | |
| Agree | 1 | 187 | 301 |
| 10.0% | 21.7% | 16.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 31 | 53 |
| 0.0% | 3.6% | 2.9% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 102 | 275 |
| 0.0% | 11.8% | 15.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 861 | 1834 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: My institution’s text-analysis capabilities are adequate. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 4 | 307 | 644 |
| 40.0% | 35.8% | 35.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 72 | 167 |
| 10.0% | 8.4% | 9.1% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 74 | 171 |
| 30.0% | 8.6% | 9.3% | |
| Neutral | 0 | 93 | 199 |
| 0.0% | 10.8% | 10.9% | |
| Agree | 0 | 42 | 97 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 5.3% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 7 | 18 |
| 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.0% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 2 | 263 | 538 |
| 20.0% | 30.7% | 29.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 858 | 1834 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: My institution provides adequate resources to support cross-institutional research collaborations. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 5 | 261 | 545 |
| 50.0% | 30.3% | 29.7% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 84 | 198 |
| 10.0% | 9.8% | 10.8% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 80 | 171 |
| 10.0% | 9.3% | 9.3% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 100 | 206 |
| 10.0% | 11.6% | 11.2% | |
| Agree | 1 | 96 | 188 |
| 10.0% | 11.1% | 10.3% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 19 | 42 |
| 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.3% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 221 | 484 |
| 10.0% | 25.7% | 26.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 861 | 1834 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.1. Research: In general, I am satisfied with my institution’s support for my research needs. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 73 | 200 |
| 2.9% | 2.4% | 3.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 311 | 686 |
| 2.9% | 10.2% | 11.3% | |
| Disagree | 9 | 533 | 1022 |
| 25.7% | 17.4% | 16.9% | |
| Neutral | 5 | 692 | 1448 |
| 14.3% | 22.6% | 23.9% | |
| Agree | 16 | 1148 | 2009 |
| 45.7% | 37.5% | 33.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 2 | 212 | 394 |
| 5.7% | 6.9% | 6.5% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 90 | 295 |
| 2.9% | 2.9% | 4.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
35 | 3059 | 6054 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.2. Do you conduct research you consider to be data-intensive research? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 25 | 1820 | 3873 |
| 71.4% | 58.8% | 63.2% | |
| Yes | 10 | 1274 | 2260 |
| 28.6% | 41.2% | 36.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
35 | 3094 | 6133 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.3. How much data per year do you generate? | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 66 | 140 |
| 33.3% | 22.7% | 24.6% | |
| < 1 terabyte (TB) | 2 | 108 | 230 |
| 66.7% | 37.1% | 40.5% | |
| 1–10 TB | 0 | 82 | 146 |
| 0.0% | 28.2% | 25.7% | |
| >10–100 TB | 0 | 31 | 45 |
| 0.0% | 10.7% | 7.9% | |
| >100 TB–1 petabyte (PB) | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.1% | |
| > 1 PB | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 291 | 568 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: I have adequate network bandwidth available to conduct my research activities. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 46 | 106 |
| 0.0% | 3.7% | 4.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 73 | 135 |
| 0.0% | 5.8% | 6.1% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 130 | 234 |
| 10.0% | 10.4% | 10.6% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 182 | 334 |
| 30.0% | 14.5% | 15.1% | |
| Agree | 4 | 632 | 1032 |
| 40.0% | 50.3% | 46.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 1 | 146 | 268 |
| 10.0% | 11.6% | 12.1% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 47 | 108 |
| 10.0% | 3.7% | 4.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 1256 | 2217 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: I have adequate data storage for my research initiatives. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 25 | 71 |
| 0.0% | 2.0% | 3.2% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 129 | 229 |
| 10.0% | 10.2% | 10.3% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 175 | 311 |
| 0.0% | 13.9% | 14.0% | |
| Neutral | 3 | 145 | 264 |
| 30.0% | 11.5% | 11.9% | |
| Agree | 6 | 600 | 1003 |
| 60.0% | 47.7% | 45.2% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 166 | 283 |
| 0.0% | 13.2% | 12.8% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 19 | 58 |
| 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.6% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 1259 | 2219 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: Most of my research data are stored in a cloud-based/virtual environment. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 37 | 65 |
| 0.0% | 3.0% | 2.9% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 325 | 531 |
| 20.0% | 26.0% | 24.1% | |
| Disagree | 6 | 393 | 650 |
| 60.0% | 31.4% | 29.5% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 103 | 212 |
| 10.0% | 8.2% | 9.6% | |
| Agree | 1 | 250 | 460 |
| 10.0% | 20.0% | 20.8% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 87 | 157 |
| 0.0% | 7.0% | 7.1% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 56 | 132 |
| 0.0% | 4.5% | 6.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 1251 | 2207 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: IT professionals are proactive rather than reactive in responding to my research computing needs. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 75 | 156 |
| 0.0% | 6.0% | 7.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 273 | 476 |
| 22.2% | 21.7% | 21.5% | |
| Disagree | 3 | 330 | 535 |
| 33.3% | 26.3% | 24.1% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 262 | 467 |
| 22.2% | 20.9% | 21.1% | |
| Agree | 1 | 164 | 277 |
| 11.1% | 13.1% | 12.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 48 | 88 |
| 0.0% | 3.8% | 4.0% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 104 | 218 |
| 11.1% | 8.3% | 9.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
9 | 1256 | 2217 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: The wait time for research computing consultation assistance is too long. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 196 | 348 |
| 10.0% | 15.7% | 15.7% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 74 | 129 |
| 10.0% | 5.9% | 5.8% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 220 | 337 |
| 10.0% | 17.6% | 15.2% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 314 | 557 |
| 10.0% | 25.1% | 25.2% | |
| Agree | 4 | 163 | 303 |
| 40.0% | 13.0% | 13.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 67 | 108 |
| 0.0% | 5.4% | 4.9% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 2 | 218 | 428 |
| 20.0% | 17.4% | 19.4% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 1252 | 2210 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: Communication between my research team and IT professionals regarding RC needs is adequate and appropriate. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 14 | 35 |
| 0.0% | 4.9% | 6.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 48 | 99 |
| 0.0% | 16.8% | 17.8% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 54 | 101 |
| 33.3% | 18.9% | 18.2% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 63 | 119 |
| 33.3% | 22.1% | 21.4% | |
| Agree | 0 | 65 | 119 |
| 0.0% | 22.8% | 21.4% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 19 | 25 |
| 0.0% | 6.7% | 4.5% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 22 | 57 |
| 33.3% | 7.7% | 10.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 285 | 555 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: IT professionals play an integral part in providing research computing services for me/my research team. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 18 | 33 |
| 0.0% | 6.4% | 6.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 1 | 85 | 168 |
| 33.3% | 30.2% | 30.5% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 54 | 112 |
| 0.0% | 19.2% | 20.3% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 39 | 78 |
| 33.3% | 13.9% | 14.2% | |
| Agree | 0 | 38 | 64 |
| 0.0% | 13.5% | 11.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 28 | 37 |
| 0.0% | 10.0% | 6.7% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 19 | 59 |
| 33.3% | 6.8% | 10.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 281 | 551 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: I have enough computational resources at my disposal to conduct my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 10 | 24 |
| 0.0% | 3.5% | 4.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 32 | 80 |
| 0.0% | 11.2% | 14.5% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 47 | 93 |
| 0.0% | 16.5% | 16.8% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 50 | 104 |
| 33.3% | 17.5% | 18.8% | |
| Agree | 1 | 110 | 182 |
| 33.3% | 38.6% | 32.9% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 30 | 47 |
| 0.0% | 10.5% | 8.5% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 6 | 23 |
| 33.3% | 2.1% | 4.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 285 | 553 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: I have enough data storage resources at my disposal to conduct my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 9 | 30 |
| 0.0% | 3.2% | 5.4% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 45 | 90 |
| 0.0% | 15.8% | 16.3% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 49 | 87 |
| 0.0% | 17.3% | 15.7% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 35 | 77 |
| 33.3% | 12.3% | 13.9% | |
| Agree | 2 | 105 | 191 |
| 66.7% | 37.0% | 34.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 36 | 61 |
| 0.0% | 12.7% | 11.0% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 5 | 17 |
| 0.0% | 1.8% | 3.1% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 284 | 553 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: I have enough visualization resources at my disposal to conduct my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 39 | 77 |
| 0.0% | 13.8% | 14.0% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 45 | 98 |
| 0.0% | 15.9% | 17.8% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 53 | 90 |
| 33.3% | 18.7% | 16.3% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 44 | 80 |
| 33.3% | 15.5% | 14.5% | |
| Agree | 0 | 53 | 91 |
| 0.0% | 18.7% | 16.5% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 10 | 20 |
| 0.0% | 3.5% | 3.6% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 1 | 39 | 95 |
| 33.3% | 13.8% | 17.2% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 283 | 551 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: My institution provides adequate resources for data backup/restore in the event of loss or corruption. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 37 | 82 |
| 33.3% | 13.0% | 14.8% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 71 | 140 |
| 0.0% | 25.0% | 25.3% | |
| Disagree | 1 | 49 | 97 |
| 33.3% | 17.3% | 17.5% | |
| Neutral | 0 | 32 | 67 |
| 0.0% | 11.3% | 12.1% | |
| Agree | 1 | 66 | 114 |
| 33.3% | 23.2% | 20.6% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 21 | 30 |
| 0.0% | 7.4% | 5.4% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 8 | 24 |
| 0.0% | 2.8% | 4.3% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 284 | 554 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: Overall, I have the IT cyberinfrastructure resources and support I need to effectively pursue my research. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 1 | 16 | 40 |
| 33.3% | 5.7% | 7.3% | |
| Strongly disagree | 0 | 51 | 109 |
| 0.0% | 18.1% | 19.8% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 52 | 103 |
| 0.0% | 18.5% | 18.7% | |
| Neutral | 1 | 56 | 116 |
| 33.3% | 19.9% | 21.1% | |
| Agree | 1 | 80 | 125 |
| 33.3% | 28.5% | 22.7% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 19 | 30 |
| 0.0% | 6.8% | 5.5% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 7 | 27 |
| 0.0% | 2.5% | 4.9% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
3 | 281 | 550 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 5.4. Data: I am generally satisfied with the provision of research computing technologies at my institution. | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Don’t know | 0 | 35 | 69 |
| 0.0% | 2.8% | 3.1% | |
| Strongly disagree | 2 | 152 | 279 |
| 20.0% | 12.1% | 12.6% | |
| Disagree | 0 | 216 | 391 |
| 0.0% | 17.3% | 17.7% | |
| Neutral | 2 | 298 | 541 |
| 20.0% | 23.8% | 24.5% | |
| Agree | 6 | 453 | 729 |
| 60.0% | 36.2% | 33.0% | |
| Strongly agree | 0 | 73 | 137 |
| 0.0% | 5.8% | 6.2% | |
| Not applicable to my research | 0 | 25 | 66 |
| 0.0% | 2.0% | 3.0% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
10 | 1252 | 2212 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
For the next set of questions, respondents were asked to rate themselves on a scale of 0–100.
| 6.1a. Disposition towards IT | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reluctant vs. Enthusiast | Mean | 71.3 | 71.0 | 71.9 |
| SD | 21.3 | 21.6 | 22.6 | |
| N | 53 | 4348 | 11139 | |
| Late adopter vs. Early adopter | Mean | 56.6 | 60.1 | 61.4 |
| SD | 24.7 | 24.9 | 25.6 | |
| N | 52 | 4285 | 10882 | |
| Technophobe vs. Technophile | Mean | 65.1 | 63.6 | 63.9 |
| SD | 24.5 | 23.2 | 24.0 | |
| N | 49 | 4112 | 10440 | |
| Skeptic vs. Cheerleader | Mean | 58.8 | 58.9 | 61.0 |
| SD | 23.7 | 22.8 | 24.0 | |
| N | 49 | 4105 | 10508 | |
| By-the-book vs. Experimenter | Mean | 66.8 | 63.8 | 64.8 |
| SD | 19.3 | 21.7 | 22.4 | |
| N | 49 | 4195 | 10686 | |
| Critic vs. Supporter | Mean | 63.7 | 63.5 | 65.0 |
| SD | 19.6 | 22.3 | 23.5 | |
| N | 50 | 4138 | 10572 | |
| Conservative vs. Radical | Mean | 57.7 | 55.6 | 56.3 |
| SD | 18.7 | 19.0 | 20.2 | |
| N | 43 | 3851 | 9855 | |
| 6.1b. Attitude towards IT | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissatisfied vs. Satisfied | Mean | 63.7 | 64.2 | 65.7 |
| SD | 19.2 | 19.4 | 20.7 | |
| N | 51 | 4260 | 10869 | |
| Discontent vs. Content | Mean | 61.5 | 62.4 | 64.1 |
| SD | 18.9 | 19.7 | 20.7 | |
| N | 48 | 4158 | 10601 | |
| Perturbed vs. Pleased | Mean | 60.2 | 62.2 | 63.9 |
| SD | 20.2 | 20.1 | 21.2 | |
| N | 44 | 4078 | 10433 | |
| Burdensome vs. Beneficial | Mean | 65.0 | 65.8 | 67.6 |
| SD | 18.5 | 22.4 | 23.3 | |
| N | 51 | 4199 | 10722 | |
| Useless vs. Useful | Mean | 71.9 | 72.4 | 73.4 |
| SD | 16.7 | 20.5 | 21.6 | |
| N | 47 | 4220 | 10762 | |
| Distraction vs. Enhancement | Mean | 63.4 | 65.4 | 67.1 |
| SD | 19.6 | 22.4 | 23.4 | |
| N | 49 | 4137 | 10568 | |
| 6.1c. Usage of IT | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never connected vs. Always connected | Mean | 75.8 | 77.0 | 77.1 |
| SD | 20.0 | 21.3 | 21.9 | |
| N | 54 | 4415 | 11238 | |
| Peripheral vs. Central | Mean | 71.7 | 70.3 | 70.5 |
| SD | 18.5 | 21.2 | 21.8 | |
| N | 50 | 4215 | 10647 | |
| Old media vs. New media | Mean | 68.9 | 66.9 | 68.1 |
| SD | 20.1 | 20.4 | 21.2 | |
| N | 47 | 4184 | 10627 | |
| Infrequent vs. Frequent | Mean | 79.5 | 76.8 | 77.0 |
| SD | 16.4 | 21.0 | 21.8 | |
| N | 53 | 4361 | 11042 | |
| 6.2. Gender | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 24 | 2311 | 5357 |
| 42.1% | 49.4% | 44.9% | |
| Female | 32 | 2231 | 6224 |
| 56.1% | 47.7% | 52.2% | |
| Other | 0 | 8 | 20 |
| 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | |
| Prefer not to answer | 1 | 128 | 326 |
| 1.8% | 2.7% | 2.7% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4678 | 11927 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 6.3. Age | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prefer not to answer | 3 | 285 | 759 |
| 5.3% | 6.2% | 6.4% | |
| Under 50 | 24 | 2109 | 5286 |
| 42.1% | 45.6% | 44.8% | |
| 50 or older | 30 | 2234 | 5767 |
| 52.6% | 48.3% | 48.8% | |
| Total respondent count (Percentages sum to 100%) |
57 | 4628 | 11812 |
| 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 6.4. Faculty load area | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agriculture and natural resources | 0 | 308 | 396 |
| 0.0% | 6.6% | 3.3% | |
| Biological/life sciences | 6 | 545 | 1029 |
| 10.5% | 11.6% | 8.6% | |
| Business, management, marketing | 1 | 333 | 1117 |
| 1.8% | 7.1% | 9.4% | |
| Communications/journalism | 2 | 172 | 561 |
| 3.5% | 3.7% | 4.7% | |
| Computer and information sciences | 9 | 191 | 654 |
| 15.8% | 4.1% | 5.5% | |
| Education, including physical education | 9 | 444 | 1419 |
| 15.8% | 9.5% | 11.9% | |
| Engineering and architecture | 4 | 425 | 674 |
| 7.0% | 9.1% | 5.7% | |
| Fine and performing arts | 4 | 230 | 742 |
| 7.0% | 4.9% | 6.2% | |
| Health sciences, including professional programs | 3 | 825 | 1664 |
| 5.3% | 17.6% | 14.0% | |
| Humanities | 8 | 594 | 1604 |
| 14.0% | 12.7% | 13.5% | |
| Liberal arts/general studies | 1 | 314 | 1053 |
| 1.8% | 6.7% | 8.8% | |
| Manufacturing, construction, repair, or transportation | 0 | 18 | 80 |
| 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.7% | |
| Physical sciences, including mathematical sciences | 6 | 486 | 1210 |
| 10.5% | 10.4% | 10.2% | |
| Public administration, legal, social, and protective services | 1 | 93 | 214 |
| 1.8% | 2.0% | 1.8% | |
| Social sciences | 16 | 749 | 1759 |
| 28.1% | 16.0% | 14.8% | |
| Other | 2 | 339 | 1068 |
| 3.5% | 7.2% | 9.0% | |
| Total respondent count | 57 | 4679 | 11907 |
| 6.5. Ethnicity | University of Maryland, Baltimore County |
DR public institutions |
All US institutions |
|---|---|---|---|
| White | 42 | 3737 | 9254 |
| 76.4% | 80.9% | 78.6% | |
| Black/African American | 2 | 103 | 382 |
| 3.6% | 2.2% | 3.2% | |
| Hispanic/Latino | 3 | 155 | 536 |
| 5.5% | 3.4% | 4.6% | |
| American Indian/Native/Alaskan | 0 | 50 | 134 |
| 0.0% | 1.1% | 1.1% | |
| Asian/Pacific Islander | 4 | 268 | 616 |
| 7.3% | 5.8% | 5.2% | |
| Other | 0 | 69 | 189 |
| 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.6% | |
| Prefer not to answer | 6 | 356 | 989 |
| 10.9% | 7.7% | 8.4% | |
| Total respondent count | 55 | 4619 | 11773 |